Thank you, Jonathan. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Allstate's third quarter 2020 earnings conference call.

After prepared remarks, we'll have a question-and-answer session. Yesterday, following the close of the market, we issued our news release and investor supplement, filed our 10-Q, and posted today's presentation on our website at allstateinvestors.com.

Our management team is here to provide perspective on these results and further context on a Transformative Growth Plan to accelerate growth in the personal property-liability business. As noted on the first slide of the presentation, our discussion will contain non-GAAP measures for which there are reconciliations in the news release and the investor supplement and forward-looking statements about Allstate's operations.

Allstate's results may differ materially from these statements, so please refer to our 10-K for 2019 and other public documents for information on potential risks. And now, I'll turn it over to Tom.

Good morning everybody. As usual, we appreciate you joining us, investing your time to learn more about Allstate.

This was just an exceptional quarter. I mean, we're adapting, we're executing, we're investing for the future.

We adapted to the pandemic, the wildfires, the hurricanes, record low interest rates, and despite all of that, our execution enabled us to make $1.1 billion. At the same time, our Transformative Growth is coming to light.

The stock is a great value on any measure. So we executed a $750 million ASR.

Our team has performed exceptionally well this year, serving customers, creating economic value, and building a stronger foundation for growth. So let's start on Slide 2, which has Allstate's strategy, which is shown by the two ovals on the left.

We're going to increase market share on Personal Property-Liability with our Transformative Growth Plan, which has three components. You remember that: expand customer access; improve customer value, which includes improving our price position and launching new products; and then investing in marketing technology.

You'll hear more about that from Glenn, and then we'll - and then Mario will go through the numbers, and then we'll get to your questions. We're also expanding our protection businesses to increase - which is increasing the total addressable market we serve.

We have an edge in this expansion by leveraging the Allstate brand, our customer base and our operating capabilities, which you can see in between those two ovals. For a company that empowers customers that is, you know we provide affordable simple connected products.

There has been plenty to protect them from this year. As I mentioned, we get all kinds of severe weather and catastrophes and there we moved with speed and efficiency, and you can see that from our third quarter results, and those are shown on the right.

Our profitability was excellent. Adjusted net income was $2.94 a share, and return on equity 17.7%.

Underwriting results also remain really strong, we get favorable auto insurance results which offset the elevated home insurance losses from increased catastrophes. Implementation in Transformative Growth Plan is accelerating with the initiation of cost reduction plan in the new Allstate advertising campaign.

Investment income was off slightly due to lower interest rates, but the performance-based income returned to prior year levels. We did have an annual review of our actuarial assumptions for Allstate Life, Benefits and Annuity businesses which assumes that the continued low interest rate environment carries forward and reduces future investment income over the next 25 years and that resulted in several charges for the reduced net income, and Mario will go through a specific slide to show you how that works.

Allstate Protection Plans has continued to grow policies, revenue and income, while expanding its total addressable market or total addressable market. So despite a tumultuous operating environment, we delivered great customer experiences, growth, excellent returns and progress on the Transformative Growth Plan.

If we go to Slide 3, let's do the numbers. Total revenues of $11.5 billion increased 3.9% to the prior year quarter, and that reflects both higher net realized capital gain and growth in property-liability premiums earned.

Net income of $1.1 billion increased by 26.7% to the prior year quarter, as you can see that in the table, as higher revenues more than offset Allstate Life and Annuity income in connection - which was down because in connection with those actuarial assumption. Adjusted net income of $923 million was $2.94 per share.

It was $23 million lower than the prior year quarter. Its higher auto insurance underwriting income was more than offset by the elevated catastrophe losses or restructuring charges related to Transformative Growth and the lower Allstate Life and Annuities income.

Our returns remained excellent, and as I said, the return on equity is well above the range that we've discussed. So let me turn it over to Glenn, who will talk about third quarter results for Personal Property-Liability.

Thanks Tom. So let's go to Slide 4, and we'll discuss the - as Tom said, very strong performance of our Property-Liability business.

Before going deeper into the results, it's worth mentioning that consistent with how we operate under Transformative Growth, Insurance and Allstate Financial results were combined beginning in the third quarter. Property-liability results were strong with excellent recorded and underlying profitability.

Growth was modest and lower than prior year quarter for auto insurance, but in the range that we expected as we build the foundation of Transformative Growth. And let me go into some detail on that before continuing on this slide.

First, the three components of Transformative Growth were all making progress. The path is a bit steeper though at the beginning for several reasons.

One, in our direct business, we lowered advertising for insurance brand since its being sunset, and that has a negative impact on new business there. At the same time, we've improved new business sales flows for online sales and improved our sales practices in our call centers for the Allstate brand being sold direct, which is significantly increasing volumes there but not yet enough to offset the insurance drop.

Volume in our Allstate agents channel is on plan, except for the first two months of the pandemic, and we believe the shift in compensation towards new business that we start this year is working. We stopped hiring new agents under the existing commission contract early this year, since we're building a new lower cost agent model.

We also increased base level production requirements coming into this year for agents as we're investing in agents who want to grow their business. This resulted in a planned and expected decline in licensed producers as we build the foundation on a high quality set of producers.

We were in the right place with the right product at the right time when it comes to Milewise, which is our pay-per-mile product. That's really appealing to customers right now, because they are driving less during the pandemic, and we're the only major carrier offering a product like that.

In the independent agent channel, Encompass had a small negative impact on growth, reflecting homeowners increases. National General acquisition which is pending will expand our access into the independent agent channel and we're really excited about the growth prospects there after closing.

The cost reductions we're implementing will enable us to further improve our competitive position in auto insurance and drive growth while earning attractive returns. And on the homeowner side, premium grew 2.6% from the prior year quarter.

This was due to policy growth of 1.2% and average premium increases. We're really well positioned for further growth in the homeowners business.

In total, we believe that the foundation we are building to be a major player in both the direct space and independent agent space that will add to our great exclusive agent channel that we already have will lead to transformative growth. So now we'll go back to our slide and we've got a bullet or two here.

Underwriting income was $753 million, increasing $16 million compared to the prior year. While the recorded combined ratio was equal to last year's third quarter, there were many meaningful changes underneath that, which are shown in the lower left chart.

Starting on the left, the underlying loss ratio improved 7.8 points, primarily due to lower auto insurance losses from fewer accidents due to lower miles driven. Underlying loss ratio improvement was offset by elevated catastrophe losses in homeowners, unfavorable reserve development in discontinued lines, restructuring charges and Allstate's efforts to help customers during the pandemic, which are all shown in red.

Catastrophe losses of $990 million in the third quarter were driven by a very active hurricane season and ongoing wildfires in the West Coast. This is partially offset by favorable prior year catastrophe development recognized in the quarter with $450 million and $45 million respectively coming from the PG&E and Southern California Edison subrogation settlements.

Non-catastrophe prior year reserve re-estimates were adverse $70 million in the quarter, this includes $132 million adverse from the annual review of asbestos, environmental and other reserves in the Discontinued Line and Coverage segment, which was partially offset by favorable re-estimates in the Allstate Protection personal lines. The chart on the right breaks down the expense ratio components.

Excluding the impact of restructuring charge and bad debt in the third quarter, the expense ratio was 22.6, a 1.1 point improvement compared to prior-year quarter. It also represents a 2.5 point improvement if you go back to 2018.

Moving to Slide 5, let's discuss our progress on Transformative Growth. And as Tom covered, Transformative Growth is a multi-year effort to accelerate growth through three components: expanding customer access, improving customer value, and investing in marketing and technology.

Customer access was expanded by combining the direct sales capabilities under the Allstate brand, which enables us to leverage insurances capabilities with a stronger brand of Allstate. We're also enhancing local agent sales models to improve effectiveness and efficiency.

And customer value is being improved by implementing a cost reduction program. This enables us to offer more affordable prices while maintaining strong margins.

We also continue to improve the competitive price position of auto insurance with pricing sophistication. The third component is investing in marketing and technology.

In the third quarter, we launched our new advertising campaign to reposition the brand supported by increased spend. Technology investments continue to improve customer facing interactions including the launch of the Allstate OneApp which simplifies all of our digital interactions in access, including telematics offerings.

Moving to Slide 6, we're still deeper into a few of the actions taken in the third quarter to advance Transformative Growth. We're executing a cost reduction plan that streamlining operations and processes across claims, sales, service and support functions to lower costs.

Lower costs enable us to have more affordable price without sacrificing attractive returns. The plan impacts approximately 3,800 employees this year, which will result in a charge of $290 million, with $198 million of that recognized in the third quarter and the balance in future quarters.

The bulk of the charges for employee benefits incentives, including expanded transition support, extended medical coverage and deployment search assistance. The remainder is driven by real estate exit costs.

At the same time, we launched a new advertising campaign in September built on the belief that we all deserve to live life well protected, as shown on the right side of the slide. The campaign repositions our brand and updates the messaging to generate business across a broader audience by showing the breadth of product portfolio we have including identity and service protection.

The campaign also emphasizes a connected experience with telematics capabilities as customers' behaviors and needs are changing. I'll now turn it over to Mario to cover the rest of our results.

Thanks Glenn. Let's go to Slide 7, which highlights investment performance for the quarter.

The chart on the left shows net investment income totaled $832 million in the quarter, which was $48 million below prior year due to a decline in market-based income. Market-based income shown in blue was $68 million below the prior year quarter.

With lower interest rates, our reinvestment rates remain below the average interest-bearing portfolio yield which reduces income. Performance-based income totaled $210 million in the third quarter as shown in gray, partially reversing valuation declines recorded in the first half of the year.

GAAP total returns are shown in the table on the right. Year-to-date returns were 4.4% and the latest 12 months was 5.7%, reflecting higher fixed income and public equity valuations.

Performance-based investment return was 2.4% for the quarter, but remained negative year-to-date. Our performance-based strategy has a longer-term investment horizon with higher but more volatile return expectations compared to the market-based portfolio.

The compound annual rate of return on the performance based portfolio is 7.2% over the past five years as is shown on the bottom right of the table, exceeding the market-based return by 220 basis points. Let's move to Slide 8 and review results for Allstate Life, Benefits and Annuities.

Allstate's annual review of assumptions and the expectation of lower long-term interest rates unfavorably impacted the Allstate Life, benefits and Annuities segments in the third quarter. Allstate Life shown on the left recorded an adjusted net loss of $14 million in the third quarter.

The loss was due to accelerated amortization of deferred acquisition costs, primarily from lower projected future interest rates related to the annual review of assumptions. Higher contract benefits also reduced adjusted net income, including $22 million in coronavirus death claims.

Allstate Benefits adjusted net income of $33 million in the third quarter was $2 million higher than the prior year quarter, driven by a decrease in contract benefits, primarily due to lower claim experience. This decrease was driven by limited activities and the deferral of non-essential medical procedures as a result of the pandemic.

The benefit from lower reported claim experience was partially offset by the acceleration of deferred acquisition cost amortization related to the annual review of assumptions. Allstate Annuities had adjusted net income of $37 million in the third quarter as contract benefits decreased primarily from favorable mortality experience compared to the prior year quarter.

In the third quarter, Allstate Annuities also recorded a premium deficiency reserve of $225 million, pre-tax, given the expectation that interest rates will remain low over the long duration of these liabilities and annuitants are living longer than originally anticipated. While this reduced net income for the quarter, it did not impact adjusted net income.

And let's turn to Slide 9 to discuss the Allstate Annuities and the premium deficiency reserve in a little more detail. As you can see on the chart, we've been reducing our Annuity business consistently over the last 15 years to manage risk-adjusted returns.

As a result of this dynamic, we began to systematically exit these businesses. In 2006, we reinsured the variable annuity business.

In 2010, we exited the broker dealer channel. In 2013, we stopped issuing structured settlements.

And in 2014, we stopped issuing all remaining annuity products and sold Lincoln Benefit Life. As a result, liabilities declined from $75 billion in 2005 to $17.5 billion as of the end of the third quarter.

Today, liabilities are made up of that $17.5 billion dollars of reserves and contract holder funds related to deferred and immediate annuities. Our asset liability management strategy has positioned the portfolio to cash match near term liabilities while investing in public equities and performance-based assets for longer duration liabilities to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Two-thirds of the payments on these annuities are expected to be made after 2030. As part of our third quarter review of actuarial assumptions we lowered our long-term return assumptions given the expectation that interest rates will remain low for an extended period.

This reduces expected future investment income. Mortality assumptions were also updated to reflect the expectation that annuitant will live longer.

These two changes led to a forecast where current reserves and expected returns on those reserves over the life of these annuities is less than the expected payouts, which led to the charge of $225 million pretax. So now let's go to Slide 10 and discuss the results of our service businesses.

The service businesses continue to generate strong growth as policies in force increased 38.6% to $133 million in the third quarter, driven by Allstate Protection plans growth. Revenue, excluding the impact of realized gains and losses grew 16.9% to $484 million in the third quarter.

Adjusted net income of $40 million reflects an increase of $32 million compared to the third quarter of 2019. The improvement continues to be driven by the growth of Allstate Protection Plans and improved profitability at Allstate roadside services.

Now let's turn to Slide 11 to review the results of Allstate Protection plans in a bit more detail. So, as you remember, the acquisition in early 2017 for $1.4 billion further expanded our circle of protection for customers and continues to exceed growth and profit expectations.

As you can see in the chart on the left, Allstate Protection Plan has had exceptional growth since acquisition in early 2017. Policies in force increased more than fourfold from less than 30 million policies in 2017 to 126 million in the third quarter of 2020.

This represents a compound annual growth rate of 51%. In addition, net written premium of $831 million for the first nine months of 2020 increased 50% compared to the prior year period.

On the right you can see that Allstate Protection plans began generating positive adjusted net income in early 2018, which is earlier than expected. The upward trajectory has continued this year, generating $105 million of adjusted net income through the first nine months of 2020.

Even more important to shareholder value is the trajectory going forward from here. The team has successfully expanded the total addressable market into appliances, furniture, cellular carriers and international markets with revenues in each of these areas.

The combination of attractive unit economics, scalable technology platform and the power of The Allstate brand will lead to continued profitable growth in this business. Quite simply, this is not your typical protection platform.

Finally on Slide 12, we want to highlight Allstate's attractive returns and strong capital position. Allstate generated strong returns on capital with an adjusted net income return on equity of 17.7% as of the end of the third quarter.

We returned $967 million to common shareholders in the third quarter. Through a combination of $798 million in share repurchases and $169 million in common stock dividends.

Over the last year, we have reduced common shares outstanding by 6.4% primarily as a result of our share repurchase program. As you can see from the table.

Book value per share of $82.39 increased 18% compared to the third quarter of last year, reflecting income generation and increased fixed income valuations, partially offset by cash returned to shareholders. Allstate stock valuation metrics, however, have not kept pace with this combined strength and strong operating performance.

With that context we will open up the line for questions.

First question is with regards to top line growth. So I understand there are a lot of moving parts here and you're selling early to maybe the end of the beginning of the transformative growth plan.

At what point do you think we actually do start seeing the initiative and the various components there resulted in top line growth?

Yaron, this is Tom. So they - we can't really give you a quarter and say here's one that turn a say you should buy the stock right before that.

So that what is really reflecting the terrible pop because a number of things happening. Right?

So we're trying to make sure we take care of our existing customers well, and that requires, as we change out some of the agents and the stuff Glenn talked about, we have to make sure we're doing that well with integrated service and moving people to other agencies. Second, there is obviously a competitive market in which we're in.

So part of it depends what happens with our competitors and what they do, how much more they put into advertising, how much they raise homeowners prices. I think that what I would say is the focus seems to be narrowed down to just auto insurance and really transformative growth is about auto insurance is about home insurance where we're getting a growth - good growth and not as much as we think we can have, but certainly higher than auto and then the circle of protection.

So I can't really call it by quarter. I would say is, you should expect as you see the components come into place.

You should expect to see a trajectory up from here. But we're not giving specific guidance on here.

Here's where more going to be at X percent of market share gains.

Okay. And then my second question, somewhat related these launch of the Allstate One app.

Are there any metrics you can share with us around, have the company applications have been downloaded, take-up rate in the ease of use or how long it takes to get a quote on the app?

Well we have - average that we have a whole bunch of metrics and we don't give most of them out, because we think we're starting to get in advantage versus our competitors on it and we really don't want them copying what we are doing that in both sub year on to your point, both on things like also in telematics. So we're really positive about what we got going on there.

And, but we - I would tell you that the insurance industry in general is not to the level that banks are which says we have a lot of potential to increase our connectivity and lower cost at the same time. Glenn, anything you would add to that?

No, I think that covers it.

So I'm going to stick with the transformative growth plan. And I think in your second bullet point, you talked about improving customer value.

So there's two pieces of that as we sit outside looking in, one is the expense ratio initiatives that you've highlighted. The other one would be just price to your customers.

So can you give us an idea of where the expense ratio will go to or what sort of objective you have in the context of your competition? And then, on price, we have observed a number of your competitors starting to cut prices in the marketplace and in auto insurance and I'm curious about your posture with respect to that.

Greg, let me start with the overview on transformer growth and then Glenn, if you could jump into where we are on pricing these. So transformer growth has three components, right.

Second one is improved customer value, that is really two components to it. But one is improve the competitive price position and with affordable products.

And second is to launch new products, the things like [indiscernible]. So the second piece is really about more differentiation price the cost piece is really the way a door you go through to get to the price piece.

So they are not separate. So in the reason we haven't put cost targets out there, we obviously have cost target and we also have price competitive targets.

The reason we haven't put those out there is, they are tightly linked. And we don't want to signal to our competitors, where we think we're going our price.

So it's not that we don't have targets we do, and we think we can reduce our costs, which enables us to give customers better value called more affordable price without sacrificing attractive margins. So that's the path we're on.

Reduce expenses, if those expense is down turn that into a more affordable price, which increases your closed rate, which then drives growth. So the first - it's really one component that you're talking about.

The second piece will take some time, because you have to rebuild the whole technology stack, there's just a bunch of work that has to be done to launch new products. That will take a couple of years to really get done, which is why we keep this is a multi-year initiative.

Glenn, do you want to give Greg an update on pricing and your thoughts there?

Yes, you've covered, Tom. Well, the - going forward, how we bring the cost down and keep margins while being a better value for customers.

But I don't want to leave anybody the impression that we're not moving now because sometimes you can look at a like an investor supplement and say, well, it was zero rate taken and think that that means there is zero rate action. We have made hundreds of filings over the last quarter, all across the country and I know you always hear me say it Greg, but we manage this at the market level.

So we've got a really talented group of state managers, I always talk about that. They've got their hands on the lever they’re looking at, how competitive are we each competitor in this market, what's our close rate doing, what type of shifts are we seeing in customers and quoting and they're moving those levers all the time and we're working with regulators to do that.

So the hundreds of filings that we've made already since the pandemic and through this time have materially changed our competitive position in spite of that 0.0, you see on total rate filing. We've done things like improved our competitive position on telematic products, increased new business discounts, changed pricing around for the type of people that are shopping.

And so the average person that's out there shopping for insurance is getting a lower price rate now for us than they were six months ago or nine months ago meaningfully lower. And so this is how we stay competitive, and it goes a little bit back to Yaron's comment or question on growth, and I look at it as while we're building this foundation, like I mean we're setting up the capability for us to be a major player in direct.

We are setting up the capability for us to be a major player in independent agent with the acquisition that's pending. And while we're building that foundation, I'd call it, we're holding our own.

Like we actually grew policies year-over-year, policies in force, minimally in auto more so in home, but we're doing a good job of keeping the fight going and keeping our growth engine going in spite of building that foundation.

Your answers makes sense. I guess the second question, and it's just going to pivot to the other source of income would be investment income and just looking over the Slide 7 and considering Mario's comments, there is obviously two pieces and it's been volatile this year.

But it feels like because of the current interest rate environment there is going to be downward pressure on your market-based returns and therefore investment earnings you generate off that for the next year or two. And then also on the performance base, the volatility is interesting for us to try and model.

So can you frame it for us as we think about what the future performance might be of the performance-based portfolio?

Greg, let me go up and then, John you can talk about the risk adjusted return of volatility of the performance base. So - as - when we do our investment allocations all the way at the top, we look at risk adjusted return based on economic capital per asset class and so earlier this year when we sold $4 billion of our $6 billion of public equities, it was because we saw the pandemic come in or we thought there is going to be a dip down and then a bump back up, it was - and we are going to avoid that volatility.

We just - we didn't think the risk adjusted return was right. When we look at our market-based results and you're right.

Interest rates are coming down there at low rates, really low rates, you're probably not going to have as much capital on those bonds as you had historically. And we looked at the risk adjusted return on the performance space, we decided it was a better risk adjusted return on the performance is now.

Obviously, it comes with more volatility and particularly from quarter to quarter, as you point out, so what we did is we matched those performance space, the long-term viability is on dated annuities or capital, which we expect to have for a long time and so when you do that you can handle that in term volatility because - and that's why you get the higher risk adjusted return because you're taking on that volatility. And once you get past seven years, - you're better off owning equities and bonds, as you all know well from just looking at the pension funds.

And you get past 10 years and it's like you get double the return and you actually have less risk on equity. So that's how we got to performance-based equities and we're willing to accept that volatility either because we have liabilities or capital which we know will have and will recoup the incremental economic return over time.

Before I turn to John let me just - one other thing, as you look forward, what we do of course, is when we're managing our auto business in particular, we look at what underwriting margin do we need given what we think we're going to get in investment income. So to the extent investment income, it goes down, we given our power in underwriting, we're able to still make a good return for our shareholders even with slightly lower interest rates.

Unlike some of the life companies who have no other way to adjust their future premiums. So John, do you want to spend a few minutes talking about performance space?

Yes sure, Tom. And Greg, thanks for the question.

I'll pick up where Tom left off. When you think about performance base it can be volatile for periods of time.

As Tom mentioned, we really match it off versus longer liabilities that we have. If you take a longer-term view and this is information that's in the supplement, - over a 10-year period, the internal rate of return, which is a common way of measuring these assets is about 11.5% and when you look at it over 10 years or over five years relative to the public equity benchmarks that we think about owning these assets against, they are superior in terms of return.

So we're willing to take some of that volatility relative to more observable public markets because we think we've got a team that has skill and expertise that can extract value out of the marketplace that it isn't easy for other people to do. I tend to think of it is we've got a lot of flash lights that we can shine in different corners of the market that maybe everyone else doesn't have to extract additional value.

Now you're right to point out there has been a little bit bumpier during the course of this year and that does require some explanation. Yes, I think we'd all agree this year, it has been a pretty unique year and when you think about what releases income in performance-based assets, part of that is the deal flow itself, you need to - we invest in a particular entity, whether it's a fund or an individual investment, it improves in value over time.

And then we tend to sell those investments and it generates income. During the period of time when deal flow was down because people just travel to do due-diligence and that sort of thing it's normal to understand that that income was reduced.

There was also and we disclosed this earlier in the year, we did have some loss, we had about $130 million in actual losses in that place in as well. What we've seen this quarter is a beginning of returning to more normalized deal activity.

So we're not going to predict the future here, but there is reason if you look back, relative to what we've experienced historically, we're starting to see a pattern that starts to fit in a little bit. So long dated liabilities matches up well versus that.

We like the long run returns even though they're more volatile, but we think there is a period of what we can do in public markets. When it comes to rates you've seen us Greg, you've seen us be proactive in the way that we think about investing in our market-based portfolio.

And as Tom said, that's part of a larger enterprise system where we think about risk and return across the enterprise, whether it's underwriting risk, mortality risk or investment risk and return, and we've made changes over time to address for different market environments. So a good example of that is coming out of the global financial crisis.

We reduced interest rate risk as rates became lower and we took more credit risk. We thought that it was, that had a good risk return profile.

As rates started to increase in recent years, we've lengthened our duration to take advantage of that and that's served us quite well as interest rates have fallen here. And we've subsequently in beginning of the year we saw less value on a risk adjusted basis for public equities and reduce that.

One thing that may not be completely obvious is during the course of the year, this year we've taken further actions - we're not only are we helping buffer income by increasing duration, but we've also moved some of that equity exposure and some of our pure government exposure into almost $10 billion of investment grade credit some high quality, high yield and associated securities to help minimize the impact that lower rates we will have. I mean you're right, if rates stay this slow for a long period of time there will be a reduction of income, it's just kind of pure math that play out that way.

When I look at the Slide 7 of the presentation and you see those blue lines. It just doesn't happen that rapidly part of our investments are matched off versus longer liabilities.

So they're cash matched and then part of it has to happen as the portfolio tends to roll off over periods of time. So, it will happen if rates remain low for a long period of time, it won't happen overnight.

And we're hopeful like most people are that interest rates will recover some ground as we pull out of the COVID-induced lower interest rate paradigm that we're currently in.

First question, looking through the deck I see one of statements saying improved online and call center sales flow in Allstate direct. Can you give us a flavor for how much of your sales today I think mostly think of Allstate as a agency-based seller of insurance, but how much is coming from direct?

And related, I believe in the past you've said that as part of the transformation program, you might be offering a discount to existing customers to potentially use more of the direct platform versus the agents, is that still part of the game plan?

Mike, let me first start with the overview and [indiscernible] and Glenn, if you want to talk about sort of sales flows and what you've got going on in sales. And so, we've put together the usage, so if you looked at our old stuff last quarter you would see Esurance broken out and that was 100% direct, either online or through call centers.

We did also sell some business under the Allstate brand in the same manner, mostly through call centers, but a little bit online. And with the new format we have, we put those two together.

And so, we're not planning on breaking out how much comes out direct and how much comes through agents. You're correct in that if you buy direct, today you get, what you paid for, so you don't pay for an agent.

So you don't - the price is 7% lower if you buy direct from the company, but that's for only for new customers. We're not going back to existing customers and saying hey, how would you like the 7% price reduction because they are happy with their existing relationships.

They bought from those agents, they have as we cross-sell into those agents. So there is no really need to go disrupt that were about giving it to people anyway they want.

If you want an agent you can call us and get an agent and - you call center we’ll get you an agent, and you can have a local agent. If you want to do self-serve, and you want to do it online, we'll do that as well.

So the strategy is to really leverage the Allstate brand and take that Esurance money which was spent - Esurance advertising money which was hundreds of millions of dollars a year and throw that at the Allstate brand. So, that, we could compete more aggressively with GEICO and Progressive in the direct space.

Glenn, do you want to talk about like sales flows and how you're making that work so?

Yes, so the team that we've had that ran Esurance and has been put together as Allstate as Tom said, with the Allstate Group. And you would think that it would be relatively easy to flip a switch and say, hey, we're a direct company now and accordingly play big in this space.

But we literally have decades of connective tissue and process built around everything is an off-ramp for an agency system. And so what we want to be and aspire to be in the near term, is a company that really goes to market in both ways.

It's open access for a customer, customer that wants to click our call that we do that really effectively and we can compete with the biggest direct carriers out there. In that space and think about that as a full channel.

And then it takes nothing away from the exclusive agent channel we have which is outstanding. They do an incredible job for customers.

They've done a great job through the pandemic you can see it in our retention numbers and continue to grow that channel. But the work they've done is really the pick and shovel work of removing some of those pieces of connective tissue between channels and really going to market as a direct business.

Esurance was set up that way because it was a separate run operation. This now is common product, its common back end service that we have, but it's a separate sales channel.

Last question, circling back to the annuity business and we do appreciate all the color. I think we all get asked a lot whether Allstate would entertain a transaction.

So I know you've answered that in the past, but maybe I'll try to ask in a different way. So you've pointed out very well that you've moved a lot of the investments into kind of longer duration hopefully higher yielding assets, which is one of the things that some of the private equity backed firms do as part of their right their special sauce?

So would you say that lower interest rate environment combined with how you guys positioned the portfolio kind of makes the bid-ask spread of entering a transaction wider than it was a year or so ago?

First Mike, if you look at the one slide that we've taken annuities down some $75 billion to $17 billion over a period of time. And we've done that with a couple of objectives in mind, what we want to make sure we take care of customers do you want to get a good deal for shareholders.

And so we've been kind of whittling away at it and these are the last two chunks we have left. And we're open to different ways to do that and if we look at all different ways to do it all the time so everything from reinsurance to sales, everything else.

And so, I don't think lower interest - rates obviously are something you need to factor in. It's less important when you have the investment portfolio that you just mentioned in terms of what it does to the - it helps fill the gap from low interest rates because you're earning higher returns.

I think we have decided so this - these are becoming more scarce properties because you've seen the asset managers go out and they like having what I would call captive asset. So there is a whole host of you are all familiar with that throughout and want to buy annuity blocks.

So that they can have those assets to manage and then they separately finance the purchase of a company part with their money and part with other people's money it's a way to build a better revenue stream for themselves. We're open to that thing as long as it meets our two objectives.

One, you got to take care of our customers. So some of these customers are going to get paid for 30-plus years we don't want to turn that somebody that's going to take it all and go to Las Vegas and put it on red.

And then our customers are left hole in the bag. Secondly, we want to make sure it's good deal for our shareholders.

So, we're always looking at opportunities to further reduce the exposure. I mean, you look at that trend line.

We have a slide that is and it's - there is no reason to expect that we would try to change that trend line. It will go down by itself.

So, like they do roll off people to stop collecting payments either because their term is up or they pass away. So, but you should expect it keep going down if we can find the right way to do that for shareholders and customers then we’ll do it.

So with the sun setting of the Esurance brand we’re down to three brands now. I guess in my mind, part of the transformative growth plan is a rally behind the Allstate brand so strategically you could talk about the importance of Encompass and answer financial.

As we think about the transformative growth plan over time?

So it's Tom. I think it's really one brand.

And we have some names, but right now we have one what I would call consumer brand. There is obviously some brands amongst agents.

And so, you see us leveraging a brand, not just on direct, but Allstate Protection products. I don't believe we would have gotten Walmart and driven the kind of growth we have without the Allstate team on there and the Allstate backing.

Same is true with Home Depot, which will be rolling out starting in January. So it's really one brand.

There are - you do point out two other ways if you go to market. So Glenn, could you talk about plans or the independent agent channel Encompass with National General and then just touch on what you're doing with Answer Financial as well?

Yes so in the IA space, it really is National General and I won't get into the brand, because I don't know if any decisions made in terms of exactly the brand. But as Tom said, it's more of a branding with agents than it is with customers in that channel.

But with National General and Encompass it's really about bringing those together in sort of a reverse integration because National General has a platform, a technology platform that the IAs love. They have 42,000 existing relationships with agency locations to go along with the 10,000 that we have with Allstate and Encompass.

And between the two companies, we have a product set that goes from non-standard all the way up through high net worth and everything in between. And what I always point out on this is, I think maybe the most important part is our homeowners’ capability.

The IA space they really need that the full stack and all the capabilities and we clearly have a premier homeowners capability at Allstate. So you put all of that together and we will have the most capabilities of any carrier we will be the Number 5 in size, as soon as the closing goes through in the IA space.

But we will be number one in terms of overall top to bottom capabilities. That won't be the day that we go live it won't be that because we won’t been able to integrate products and everything and push it across.

But in short order we will be able to bring those together and really go to that market and be a very major player in the independent agent space. And that, pertaining there was second part to that.

Answer Financial?

No, I'm sorry Answer Financial, thanks. Yes, so on Answer Financial, that is - it's a very different type of model.

That really is taking care of customers who we can't take care of in other ways. Are they sort of fall between the cracks of - always narrowing cracks actually at this point because we cover just about all different types of customers at this point.

But the narrowing cracks there and it's a way to monetize the exhaust from our expense on marketing and make sure that anybody that comes to us - we can get to at some point. And so Answer Financial from a branding standpoint is separate and they sell multiple carriers.

I think going back to the National General acquisition we noticed in the Q, that there was a note that you're currently contemplating the mix of cash and debt for that purchase. I was hoping you might be able to further find your point on what your thoughts are there.

And just intertwine that into a - broader thoughts on capital management and share repurchases?

Mario you could take that.

Sure, Phil. Thanks for the question.

Yes - when we announced the National General acquisition, the financing strategy all along was part cash from our deployable capital part excess capital within the National General structure and part debt so that continues to be the strategy in terms of how we'll fund National General. So that part hasn't changed.

So we fully expect it to execute across all three dimensions and the closed process is progressing on that acquisition. In terms of broader capital management - and I think Tom mentioned this early on.

We continue to think the stock is undervalued. And we have ample capital and liquidity available to continue to buy back stock.

We got - excuse me $2.8 billion holding company assets. We got over almost $7 billion of readily available liquidity.

Our debt-to-cap ratios are below 20%. So we feel really good about the financial strength of the organization and that's one of the reasons.

That combined with our view on the relative valuation of the stock is what led us to do the $750 million ASR in the fourth quarter. We got 7 million shares as part of that.

We still have ways to go on the current share repurchase authorization. So we still have just under $1.6 billion left and we'll continue to execute on that.

And the point that's worth mentioning is, as we've said from the beginning, the National General acquisition doesn't impact the buyback program. We fully expect to complete that by the end of the year.

On your press release you were announcing the restructuring plan you made the comment that the cost reductions and job reductions were necessary in order to maintain underwriting ratios. I'm not really asking for guidance, but obviously COVID throws a little bit of curve on things?

When we think about 2019, I guess is there actually a possibility in your long-term outlook that you think the type of underwriting margins you are achieving on a COVID-normalized basis can be maintained into the years going out given price reactions and given what your goals are?

[technical difficulty] Josh, because I'm not sure what COVID-normalized are. But I think.

I think the shortest way to answer that is we are in really attractive returns on auto insurance. We have for 14-15 years, maybe longer are running and we have a system and an objective and goals that we've achieved to continue that.

When I say COVID-normalized, what we don't really know is certainly of course when the pandemic ends which is beyond your normalization. But I'm not sure what it will do to consumer behavior, particularly driving, I think computing is going to be viewed as overrated.

And so, given that about a third of the time people are in their cars they're driving to and from work. So if even a small portion of people so 25% of the people commute less.

That's a pretty big drop, and we will react to that when we can. I think what it does, it gives us more room to maintain the kind of returns we have while getting more competitive.

And so, but you should assume we’ll continue to be focused on earning attractive returns. That comment in the press release was really about saying, we didn't have to reduce cost, because we're not making money.

There are a lot of people out there who today are airlines and other people were having let people go because they just in trouble. We're not in trouble.

We're making really good money. And so we don't need to do it they are reason.

We also as we're talking about getting more competitive in auto insurance in particular. We don't want everybody.

Moving to the conclusion, which you could, if you took your question farther would be that we're going to do that by given in a way - like say anybody can give it away its talented teams that both grow and make money. And so, we were just trying to point out that the point that and Greg mentioned earlier, which is that the cost and the pricing are tightly linked.

And I know a lot of you would like to have some expense ratio target that you could put into your models but trust us, we have a measure. It's a good measure, it's aggressive, but it's tied to what we're trying to do on price.

So we're not willing to talk about that publicly.

And just a quick one on square trading growth. Obviously people are stuck at their homes, they've been buying a lot of stuff on Amazon and whatnot.

Do you think that 2020 was a record year for consumer electronics purchasing and that 2021 will face some headwinds in beating 2020 as a year for new policy yet square trading or Allstate protection plans?

Let me ask Don answer that and then just do a commercial before that, which is - we are stronger being together with SquareTrade than we were independently both in terms of what it does for a server protection and what we do for them in getting Walmart Home Depot leveraging the Allstate brand. But I would say you put this up against any of the recent IPOs out there.

This thing is worth a whole lot more than we paid for. Don, do you want to talk about what happened?

Sure. So, Josh, first, the trends have been strong for a long time.

So it's not like this year, all of a sudden SquareTrade took off, they've been doing well since the acquisition. It's been a combination of things that's driven that.

It's the growth in the existing customers by which they've been able to help drive with their customers. It's been additional customers that they've added B2B customers additional retailers and then this thing that Mario talked about which is just extending their total addressable market.

So three years ago there were largely consumer electronics to U.S. retail.

But since then it's the more than consumer electronics, it's now appliances. It's now furniture, it's now international business that's growing dramatically.

It's cell carriers and so forth. So it's been kind of expansion across the board, which has been consistent for the last three years.

This year's results, you're right, we're impacted by COVID, they were going to be strong regardless. So this was going to be a really great year.

We got the benefit of COVID but it wasn't just people buying online, it was the customers that we have the places, people are shopping in the categories that lend themselves to warranties are the ones that customers have been purchasing. So whether it's setting up our own office or setting up consumer electronics as you said.

So this year has been good and it's been positively impacted, but I think it would be a big mistake to assume it wouldn't have been good anyway. And then when you get into 2021 and those underlying trends that I talked about that have been going for three years will continue.

And so, we still expect them to continue to grow and do well. I suspect at some point the lack of buying power in the economy will probably dampen retail sales across the board, more hard to predict how that's going to happen when that's going to happen.

But I think that's the - that's on the margin, the underlying trends will continue in a very strong manner.

Thank you very much.

Add to that is, when you look forward in 2021 in Allstate Protection plans, the mix of policies going to change some. So you'll see the policy growth come, but you will see the revenues continue to accelerate as particularly as we get into bigger dollar amount per policy.

So just one thing to get a warranty policy on a iPad, it's another thing for a washer or dryer or for furniture. So you should still see and we expect increased revenue growth, but you may see a slight take off of drop maintaining 51% company growth and policies gets hard as you move into bigger dollar policies.

Now I'll take one more question and then we'll wrap up.

I guess I was hoping you could just revisit a little bit, you've already made some comments about driving behavior that's pandemic related and what you're seeing is changing, nothing terribly specific, but you had some peers are talking about these changes in driving for example, to work or not versus regular driving. As well, I was curious if you've seen differences that were material on a state basis.

Again nothing specific to state, but if there is early insights into kind of what's happening from a dynamic - from an natural behavioral perspective, I think that would be very interesting.

Glenn, why don't you answer that. I would say, Paul, the other part is with [Aire] tracking 26 million cars, we have 10 times the amount of miles driven that a company that recently went public.

And so we got lots of good math on this. So, Glenn, can share with you what he is saying, just in terms of miles driven and what the impact is on frequency.

Yes. And thanks for the question, Paul, it is interesting getting into the data in this space.

And as Tom said, with billions of miles of data we've got and the partnership with [Aire] we're able to really get into the detail. The short answer to your question is yes.

There are absolutely differences state by state. There are broad trends that are true everywhere when you see some of the things about commuting and total miles driven, but you will see based on sort of where states are in the pandemic where they have either formal stay at home orders or shutdowns or anything versus when they have more informal they just have a lot of cases coming in, and just attitude differ by state in terms of how to deal with either staying home or not and so on.

So we do see differences by state, but there is enough of a prevailing sort of tailwind on it that there is more similarities than difference. A couple of things, just to go deeper on the comments Tom made before, we see about 40% of our losses happen in rush hour.

And so, as we're working through and we predict, again, this gets to different states because obviously in metro areas it's more of a true some of that rush hour than the non-metro areas. But we get a double effect in terms of the frequency of those accidents in rush hour in one fewer people so fewer of our drivers that we insure are actually traveling during rush hour.

And so, if you're not traveling, you're not having an accident. And two, the ones who still are, because it's not zero are on less congested roads, so they have fewer accidents, and you see that in the types of accidents that remain.

So it is not a pure mix of - if there were a million accidents before and you take out 10% of them. It is not a random 10%.

It is a very specific 10%. And so with the mix of what's left is very different and all of these are things that we are looking at in a granular level down to state detail.

So that, as I mentioned before, those the pricing actions we take, the go-to-market actions we take are highly specific.

So thank you all for participating. We had an excellent quarter.

Mark is obviously available for any follow-up questions the things we didn't get to, and we'll talk to you next quarter. Thank you.