May 11, 2020
Operator
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Clipper Realty First Quarter '20 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions].
It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host Michael Frenz. Sir, the floor is yours.
Michael Frenz
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for the First Quarter 2020 Clipper Realty Inc. Earnings Conference Call.
Participating with me on today's call are David Bistricer, Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; and J.J. Bistricer, Chief Operating Officer.
Please be aware that statements made during the call that are not historical may be deemed forward-looking statements, and actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those disclosed in the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q posted today and the company's 2019 annual report on Form 10-K, which are both accessible at www.sec.gov and our website.
As a reminder, the forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this call, May 11, 2020, and the company undertakes no duty to update them. During this call, management may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO; adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA; and net operating income, or NOI.
Please see our press release, supplemental financial information and Form 10-Q posted today for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. With that, I will now turn the call over to our Co-Chairman and CEO, David Bistricer.
David Bistricer
Thank you, Michael. We are very pleased with our results.
Our portfolio performed very well and remain durable during the pandemic. We will continue to take necessary steps to navigate through the current challenges, further strengthen by additional liquidity provided by the Flatbush Gardens refinancing.
We enthusically look forward to capitalizing on a myriad of growth opportunities, including the upcoming office lease rolls, the potential expansion of Flatbush Gardens, 1010 Pacific Street redevelopment. We remain well positioned to execute our strategic initiatives and create value.
Also like to emphasize that the refinancing of the Flatbush Gardens was an enormous liquidity event for the company. And that all our debt stands on its own under the collateral.
None of the mortgages are, of course, collateralized. All the debt is standing independent.
And the next time we'll have to refinance the property other than for the Clover House will not take place until 2027. Our properties have remained open and operational throughout the pandemic.
Our portfolio is 98% leased. We are taking the necessary steps to keep our tenants safe, in compliance with state and local shelter-in-place orders.
And we continue to provide typical services to our residents. Under difficult circumstances, our business has remained durable.
We expect our properties in New York City markets to remain desirable to a broad range of tenants and our operations to return to a more normal state over time. We are extremely pleased with the operations of the company.
And we expect to be able to continue to be able to provide the services that we have provided in the past. We repaid the existing $246 million loan on the property of Flatbush Gardens that was due in March 2028.
Net interest rate, which was a 3.5% and it was replaced with an interest rate of 3.8%. The net proceeds of $78 million before reserves increased our cash position.
Importantly, we have no debt maturities of any kind of this to 2027. Our company is well positioned from a liquidity perspective.
Turning to a couple of highlights of the company for the past quarter. Clover House property brought online last August is 99% leased, validating our view that the renovation of the property, its amenities and its location to one of the most desirable neighbors of all in New York City, would drive and maintain exceptional residential demand.
We are proceeding with the redevelopment of our recent 1010 Pacific Street acquisition located in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn, about 1 mile from the Atlantic Terminal Barclays Center Hub. As previously discussed, we estimate that the project will cost $85 million in total, take 2 years to complete and develop to a 6.5% stabilized cap rate.
J.J. will provide further update to the project.
In our office portfolio, the lease roll of 250 Livingston Street property will occur in August, at which time our new lease with the City is expected to initially add approximately $5 million to the property's annual NOI. At 141 Livingston Street property, the rent will increase 25% at the end of 2020, which will add $2.1 million to the property's annual NOI.
Together, these rolls are expected to add an incremental $7.1 million of annual NOI to our portfolio, representing a 10% increase on our portfolio run rate. At our Flatbush Gardens property, we are progressing with the ULURP process, albeit it's slowed down because of the pandemic crisis, but we expect to get that back on track after the City's - City Planning Office is open up fully.
There's no assurance, however, that the application will be fully or partially approved as submitted. I would like to provide an update on the Tribeca House 421-g litigation.
As previously disclosed, the New York City Court of Appeals ruled in June 2019, the apartments and buildings receiving 421-g tax benefits are not subject to luxury deregulation, issuing order to overturn the previous unanimous Appellate Division decision. On January 7, the Appellate Division granted a full stay of the special referee's hearing regarding the calculation of potential rent overcharges in [indiscernible] rent pending appeal, which is currently expected to be argued during the September 2020 term.
We do not believe that the order will have a material impact on our business. Lastly, I would like to comment on our first quarter results.
We are very proud to report record quarterly revenue of $30.9 million, record quarterly NOI of $17.1 million and a strong AFFO of $5.6 million, all of which reflect robust leasing performance and expense management. Michael will provide further details on our financial performance shortly.
I will now turn the call to J.J., who will provide an update on operations and our response to pandemic.
Jacob Bistricer
Thank you. I would like to begin by reiterating our deep gratitude to both our employees and residents during this challenging time.
Our colleagues have worked tirelessly to assist our tenants and communities maintaining as much of a sense of normality as possible. We have taken significant steps to keep our residents and employees safe, in compliance with the government-mandated orders, including requiring all of our employees and service providers who enter our buildings to wear compliant personal protective equipment and practice social distancing.
Our properties remain open and operational, providing permitted regular services to our tenants. We are utilizing technology as appropriate to conduct operations at all levels.
For example, our property management teams are using technological resources to limit in-person contact, while continuing to provide essential maintenance services and address resident service needs. Our leasing team are able to interact remotely with prospective tenants to guide them through the process.
Our collections have been strong. In April, our collections were 94% of our collections in March prior to the impact of COVID-19.
In situations where tenants notify us that they cannot meet their rent obligations as a result of the pandemic, we may review potential alternative payment arrangements on a case-by-case basis. Turning to the first quarter.
We continue to leverage our strong position, operating performance, driving ongoing cash flow improvements through efficient leasing and focused expense management. We are very proud that our portfolio is 98% leased.
Our leasing performance at Clover House has been very strong. The property is 99% leased, and the average $71 per square foot rent is a new record.
We are well positioned moving forward with the exceptional occupancy providing leverage to future rent discussions. At 1010 Pacific Street, we are proceeding with development.
The existing warehouse structure on site has been demolished. We have filed plans for the new building and are working through the associated regulatory processes.
We expect to develop a 9-story, fully amenitized, multifamily rental building, including indoor parking with approximately 119,000 rentable square feet and 175 total residential units, 70% of which will be free market and 30% affordable. Significantly, the property is eligible for a 35-year 421(a) tax abatement due to the affordable component.
We will provide further update as we get closer to commencing construction. Tribeca House continues its strong performance.
We increased residential revenue by 4.5% in the first quarter over Q1 last year, driven by occupancy and rent per square foot gains. The property was 99.6% leased at the end of March, building on its exceptionally high occupancy trend through the winter.
Importantly, we have delivered these rent recent improvements with limited investment in the property. Tribeca House's luxury level experience at a more attractive price point compared to the surrounding neighborhood augurs well for the property's overall growth trajectory.
With full occupancy, tight apartment turnaround times that strengthen rent negotiations and significant remaining upside potential between our current $71 per square foot rent in the neighborhoods comparable $80 per square foot rents, Tribeca House is well positioned for the future. At Flatbush Gardens in Brooklyn, the complex continues to benefit from extremely high demand and was 97.2% leased at the end of March, continuing exceptional occupancy trend over the last several quarters with accompanying rent growth.
Rent per square foot of $24.95 at the end of the first quarter is a new record for the property. We increased residential revenue by 3.2% in the first quarter of Q1 last year.
Importantly, our focus on expense management drove in excess of a 500 basis point improvement in NOI margin at the property during the first quarter versus Q1 last year. As mentioned on prior earnings call, the June '19 rent stabilization law somewhat tempers the property's future rent growth trajectory.
However, rents have continued to increase, future renewals will move in tandem with annual rent guideline board increases and preferential unit vacancies still offer the ability to increase the new rent up to the maximum legal limit. Flatbush Gardens remains a very significant part of our portfolio and growth story, with the FAR expansion project and incremental value opportunity.
I will now turn the call over to Michael, who will discuss our financial results.
Michael Frenz
Thank you, J.J. Our first quarter results demonstrate the strong leasing and operational efficiencies highlighted by David and J.J.
For the first quarter, we achieved record revenues of $30.9 million, an increase of $3.2 million or 11.7% compared to the same period in 2019. We achieved record NOI of $17.1 million in the quarter, a 16.3% increase compared to the same period in 2019; and AFFO of $5.6 million or $0.13 per share, a 5.8% increase compared to the same period in 2019.
The year-over-year total revenue increase was primarily attributable to residential rate - rental rate improvements at Flatbush Gardens and Tribeca House, a fully online Clover House and the completion of the renovation and re-leasing of approximately 50% of the units at 10 West 65th Street during the second quarter last year. As J.J.
noted, Flatbush and Tribeca residential revenues grew 3.2% and 4.5% year-on-year, respectively. Clover House generated $1.7 million of revenue during the first quarter, and has rapidly approached full occupancy.
On the expense side, key year-over-year changes were as follows: property operating expenses decreased by $0.4 million in the first quarter year-on-year, primarily driven by lower legal and utilities expenses. Real estate taxes and insurance increased by approximately $1.1 million in the first quarter due to property tax increases across the portfolio and general insurance industry cost increases.
Cash, general and administrative expenses, excluding nonrecurring litigation-related costs and a onetime adjustment related to our CFO transition last year increased modestly by approximately $200,000 in the first quarter. Interest expense increased by $1.5 million in the first quarter, primarily due to the recognition of interest in connection with bringing Clover House online.
As a reminder, we finance our portfolio on an asset-by-asset basis. Our debt is nonrecourse, and it is not cross-collateralized.
We have no debt maturities on any operating properties, including Clover House until 2027. As David mentioned earlier on the call, we did announce a refinancing of our Flatbush Gardens property.
We refinanced it with a $329 million, 12-year secured first mortgage loan with New York Community Bank, the property's current lender. The loan bears interest at 3.125% and requires interest-only payments for the first 7 years, which is expected to initially reduce annual debt service by $3 million.
With the proceeds, the company repaid the existing $246 million loan on the property due March 2028, which bore interest at 3.5% through February of 2023 and was scheduled to commence principal amortization in September 2020. Net remaining proceeds of $77.8 million before reserves increased the company's cash position.
I note that in connection with the refinancing, an independent appraisal commissioned by the lender valued the property at $475 million. Turning to CapEx.
We incurred $6.1 million of capital expenditures in the first quarter, a similar amount to the fourth quarter and an approximate 50% decrease from the average spend for the first 3 quarters of 2019. This decrease was primarily driven by the completion of the Clover House renovation.
Lastly, today, we are announcing a dividend of $0.095 per share for the first quarter, the same amount as last quarter. The dividend will be paid on May 29 to shareholders of record on May 22.
Let me now turn the call back over to David for concluding remarks.
David Bistricer
Thank you, Michael. We are very pleased with our operations.
Our portfolio has performed very well and remains so throughout the pandemic. We will continue to take the necessary steps to navigate through the current challenges further strengthened by the additional liquidity provided by the refinancing.
We enthusiastically look forward to capitalizing on a myriad of growth opportunities, including the upcoming office lease rolls, the potential expansion of Flatbush Gardens and the 1010 Pacific Street redevelopment. We remain well positioned to execute on our strategic initiatives and create value.
We hope everyone stays safe and healthy and sound. With that, I would like to open up the floor for any questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. And it looks like your first question is coming from Buck Horne.
Buck Horne
Congrats on the results, the relatively strong April collections, all things considered, and the refinancing. A lot of progress, although announced.
Let me start with the April collections, if I could. And specifically, maybe if we can drill down at Flatbush and how that performed versus the rest of the portfolio, kind of what percentage of Flatbush residents came to you or applied for some sort of hardship or relief?
And how are you working with those residents in particular?
Jacob Bistricer
Yes. So as I mentioned in my remarks, we're taking this on a case-by-case basis.
Obviously, workforce housing is going to - not obviously, but we believe that workforce housing, in our instance is taking somewhat of a bigger effect due to this pandemic. And we're being cognizant of that, and we're working with each individual on individual case basis to see what we can do to help them get through this crisis.
We're not doing anything in a global manner. It's being done on a case-by-case basis, and they're telling all residents if they have something that they would like to discuss with us about their deferring payments and some sort of that nature.
If it makes sense and if it's valid, we will try to cooperate and give them that relief.
Michael Frenz
And Bob, to your initial question, I think in terms of the collections, again, we're over 90% in collections in April. And as you can imagine, that's pretty much across the board here.
I know I understand the question with Flatbush Gardens, but just as a point of reference, Flatbush in April was roughly 80% or 89% of collected. So again, I think we had a very strong performance across the board.
But Flatbush, just like the rest of the properties, performed well. And so far, it's continuing to progress here into the first 10 or so days of May.
And we'll keep watching it and keep folks updated.
Buck Horne
Okay. Yes.
So that was you think - you jumped in my next question, just to clarify, make sure I understood it, so through the first - are you saying through the first 10 days of May that your portfolio is over 90% collected and Flatbush is pretty similar to that so far?
Michael Frenz
No. What I was trying to say.
The numbers I gave were for April, again, 90-plus percent across the board. Flatbush was 88% or 89% in April.
In May, I was just saying that, again, it's only 10 days in, so it's still early, but our indication so far is that we continue to collect. And again, we don't have final numbers yet.
Flatbush is one of the properties, in particular, where I think the payments come in a little bit more staggered during the month. But so far, what we're seeing is things look pretty good, and we'll know more, obviously, in the next kind of week or 2 here.
But so far, so good.
Buck Horne
Okay. Great.
Great. And maybe just with this - again, the refinancing, congratulations on that.
That's a huge - again, like you said, a huge liquidity event. These little flush with cash at the moment, is the plan just to hold it through the duration of what's to come with the pandemic?
Do you have any other plans redevelopment wise? Or I mean, have you considered share repurchases?
I don't know what the thought process on leverage is at this point, but any thoughts on what to do with the excess cash right now?
David Bistricer
Right now, it's going to sit tight. We want to see how this pandemic plays itself out.
It's not very predictable, as you can see what's going on with this pandemic. We thought it was a very astute move to take advantage of this money because it reduces the amount of debt service that we've had on the property, it reduces the interest cost and pushes out the maturity date of the - of that particular property.
So we thought that was important to do. And we're going to wait and see how this thing plays out and see what opportunities are going to present itself in the future.
Michael Frenz
And Buck, as you can imagine as well. But on the CapEx side, just - again, as you know, we have - our portfolio is operating.
Except for the 1 property we just bought at 1010 Pacific Street, everything else is pretty much done and ready to go, we're fully operating. So in terms of kind of future CapEx spend, well, obviously, we're doing the essential stuff that needs to be done, obviously, to keep the property safe and operational and fully maintained.
But as David said, we're just sort of hunkering down here, doing what we need to do. And as we move forward on 1010 Pacific, which is really the only CapEx requirement at this point, obviously we're going to put a permanent loan in place as we move into development.
So we'll get to that. But as we sit here today, from a CapEx perspective, it's pretty minimal requirements.
Buck Horne
Okay. If I can sneak one more in, just a quick update on 1010 Pacific.
Do you think what's going on in the city and just either delays permitting wise or construction wise, is the time line on 1010 Pacific moving out yet? Or are you feeling still confident in the cost - construction cost to build and hitting your initial underwriting targets?
Any change on that front?
David Bistricer
We believe the time line, the construction time line will be steady. There won't be any push out of that.
The city has been permitting properties, especially properties that have [indiscernible] components to it. As we said on the call, the demolition is just about completed.
And we think that we have a good chance there might be a decrease in some of the construction costs out of this pandemic, prices, I think, will - we'll saw from on construction cost.
Operator
Your next question is coming from Yehuda Katz [ph].
Unidentified Analyst
And certainly, congratulations on the refinancing. That's a massive liquidity event for the company, as you said.
Just kind of as we look at 1010 Pacific and embarking on an $85 million development, I just wanted to clarify maybe what the realized yield on the last 2 redevelopments that you guys did Clover House and 10 West 61st Street were? So I guess, what were the unlevered yields?
And were those kind of on target with what you expected when you embarked on those projects?
David Bistricer
Michael?
Michael Frenz
I think on Clover House 107 Columbia heights, I think we developed that to kind of roughly to a 5% yield here. Again, I think as we mentioned on prior calls, I think we've got a lot of renovation CapEx until we realized the potential for the property and where we thought it could go.
So I think the time line, as we previously disclosed, took a little longer than we initially planned. But I think we've got it to a spot now where, as you can see in the performance, we're basically 99% leased after 5 months or so, 6 months.
And rents continue to rise. So I think we developed that one to roughly kind of a 5% range.
On 10 West 65th, that one is sort of a TBD in the sense that right now, we're doing okay. I think, as you're aware, when we bought the property, it had 76,000 rentable square feet.
It also has 52,000 square feet of air rights, which just given the current state of the market, it's not something we're in a position to utilize yet. But that is something that we're going to deal with, obviously, in the future as soon as the time is right.
So from kind of a yield perspective, I think it's sort of innings 3 of a 9-inning ballgame, if you will, where we're going to get there on the development here. So right now, we're sort of just kind of moving along with it.
Unidentified Analyst
Great. So I guess just a follow-up on the 5% number on Clover House.
Do you mind just bridging, I think the purchase price was 87.5, and then how much CapEx did that project kind of take up from start to finish? And then, I guess, what's the NOI number that you guys kind of see a stabilized yield?
Michael Frenz
CapEx roughly turned out to be kind of the $30 million range in terms of kind of final costs here. And right now, we are projecting - again, we don't yet kind of forecast, if you will, but I think on a kind of run rate basis, we're sort of in the kind of $5.5 million to $6 million range for NOI, which puts you roughly [indiscernible].
I think, again, this is something we're - just we - look, I think we can have this conversation, I think if you're happy to follow-up separately on a separate phone call, if that's easier here. I think we've - we'd like to talk about sort of the current numbers here.
So again, I think, if happy to reach out after this call, and we can talk thoroughly, if that's easier, but I can answer your questions perhaps in more detail.
Operator
Your next question is coming from Liz Bow [ph].
Unidentified Analyst
When do you expect a resolution on the Tribeca House lawsuit? And can you clarify your September 2020 comment?
David Bistricer
It's hard to predict, when there's a lawsuit out there, it's very hard to predict what the court will do, especially now in these times when the courts are not functioning. So it's difficult to tell.
Right now, sitting with an arbitrator who is supposed to come out and figure out what to determine what the rents - the new rents will be. As we've said, we don't believe that, that's material in our results, but we have no way of telling you how long this court will take its time to come to fruition.
Operator
Your next question is coming from David Boyer [ph].
Unidentified Analyst
My question relates to the CARES Act? And has the company been able to benefit at all from any of the government subsidy programs?
David Bistricer
We have decided not to make ourselves available to that act because of the advice of counsel. We think that it's been clarified it's not for public company, so we decided to not proceed with that.
Unidentified Analyst
Got it. And the - and a quick follow-up is regarding the current share pricing at a record low.
Are any of the insiders considering increasing their position?
David Bistricer
Rather not comment on what insiders are going to do at this point. So if the insiders do anything, obviously, they will file the forms, and you'll see it published as it happens.
Operator
Your next question is coming from Nathan Glick [ph].
Unidentified Analyst
So just - I know kind of Buck asked about what you guys are planning on doing with cash. You mentioned you're kind of hunkering down.
I know you do have with 1010 Pacific, there's a decent amount of cash obligations over there. So I'm just kind of just curious or, I guess, asking as far as return on investment over there relative to maybe buying back shares, how do you view that?
Clearly, where the share price is, possibly, the investment in buying back shares could be incrementally greater than the investment in 1010 Pacific. I know you mentioned you're hunkering down, but there's - cash needs to be spent in order to kind of proceed over there.
So I mean have you guys thought about, hey, should we be spending that cash right now? Could we be getting a greater return on investment in buying back shares?
David Bistricer
We may decide to do that. We just closed on this refinancing, it was Friday late in the day.
So we haven't determined yet, got to do it. The cash is not earmarked for 1010 Pacific, that the construction loan lined up for that.
And the construction loan will be used to construct that building, and as soon as we finish the building, it will be refinanced as we did with the other properties on a permanent stand-alone fixed rate mortgage.
Unidentified Analyst
So no cash needs to go in, additional cash into that kind of silo. Is that what you're saying?
David Bistricer
No cash, but most of the money will come from the financing of construction mortgages.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. So I guess, with existing cash on the balance sheet, what are the opportunities available other than buying back shares?
David Bistricer
We don't know yet. It needs to be seen.
We think that this particular pandemic will make a lot of things available to us in the future. We're not ready to act on any of them right now.
We want to see how this shakes out completely. It's a little bit too soon to tell where values and things will shake out and what opportunities will present itself.
We think towards the middle and the end of the year, we'll be in a better position to answer that question.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. If I could just say as an investor, we would love to see you buy back shares, and I think the return on investment at these prices could be - would be significant.
If I could just ask one more question, the Tribeca, the litigation. I don't know if you quantified kind of the range of where that could fall out.
Is it possible you could give us a sense?
David Bistricer
We do not quantify because as we've said on this call many times, it's still subject to an arbitrator going to determine how to calculate it. But we think it's not in any way close to being a material event for us.
Only a few people in that lawsuit, very little new people have taken advantage of that lawsuit and joined lawsuit. So we think the effect on the company is not material.
Unidentified Analyst
Only a few people. Okay.
And more people can be involved?
David Bistricer
I think the originally - I think originally there were like 40 people in the lawsuit, and 20 that moved out of the building. It's not to say they're not plaintiffs, but they moved out, and I think another 20 people have joined.
So that's, I think, the amount of people that are involved in that lawsuit.
Unidentified Analyst
Can that change in a meaningful manner? Or that cannot change?
David Bistricer
It cannot go beyond. I think the top, if I'm not mistaken, J.J., is about 75 people who will be entitled to become part of that lawsuit, but I don't think it's not a meaningful number.
Michael Frenz
I will say that the lawsuit came about or the decision, I should say, came about last June. So we're approaching the 1-year anniversary of the appeal order.
And as we've said, it's been - there's roughly 60-odd people that have come across in the last year or so or 10 months. And just clarifying timing because this question was also asked before in terms of September.
I mean, as we said, the key point is that this is a little bit of uncharted territory just given the nature of the decision. So in terms of actually how you would go about calculating the potential rent overcharge payment or whatever it may be, if there is any, it does need to be fully worked out with the help of a special referee because this is the first time, we're basically going through this.
So again, that we've - as we disclosed in our 10-Q today, it's a process that's ongoing, occasional appeals. But right now, the best timing we have is that it is scheduled to be heard in the September 2020 term.
So at least a couple of months out. But to the extent we get more clarity on either the amount, timing, et cetera, we will then provide an update to folks.
Operator
Your next question is coming from Craig Kucera.
Craig Kucera
I just wanted to clarify, was the collections number for April across the entire portfolio or just multifamily? Just some color there would be great.
David Bistricer
As we said, it's about 90% - 90% collections.
Michael Frenz
That is across the entire portfolio. It is a good point, Craig.
In the City, which, again, we have two buildings with them, as you know. The City is current with their payments as we would expect them to be.
So again, that's helpful to us. But the 90-plus percent that we talked about, that is across the entire portfolio.
But each property on its own in April was roughly in that 90% range to become and so - so far, we've seen very good results.
Craig Kucera
Got it. And as far as you do have some modest retail exposure.
Can you talk about how you're maybe working with some of those tenants? Are they asking for abatements?
Or are you working with them on deferrals? Or just some color on kind of where you're - how you're managing that process?
David Bistricer
J.J.?
Jacob Bistricer
So yes. So as I'm sure everyone is hearing, the retailers are getting hurt the most.
And whether it's the parking facilities or the fitness centers that we have in some of our properties, these are things that are happening, and these people are not functioning right now, so they're not able to pay the rent. So right now, we're in a position of waiting to see what happens.
We don't have the ability to change anything about it for the moment because it's a government-mandated closure, but we hope to come out of this sooner than later and then resume the rent collections on those properties.
Operator
And you have one remaining question in queue from Harvey Chen [ph].
Unidentified Analyst
I actually think my questions were answered earlier, but thanks again for taking my questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. We have no further questions in queue.
David Bistricer
Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again soon.
Stay well.
Jacob Bistricer
Thanks, everyone.
Operator
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's conference call.
You may disconnect your phone lines at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.