Rick Wayne - President and Chief Executive Officer Claire Bean - Chief Operating Officer Brian Shaughnessy - Chief Financial Officer

Alex Twerdahl - Sandler O’Neill

Good morning and thank you all for joining us today. With me are Claire Bean, our Chief Operating Officer; and Brian Shaughnessy, our new Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

Brian will discuss our financial results following my comments and following that we will be happy to answer your questions. Before reviewing the slides, I would like to make some overview comments on the quarter and on the year.

This quarter was our strongest one to date with net income of $2.2 million or $0.22 per diluted common share. Net income for the year was $7.1 million or $0.72 per diluted common share.

Earnings for the quarter and the year were positively affected by strong loan growth, transactional income from LASG purchase loans, gains on the sale of SBA loans originated by our national SBA division and the repurchase of our common shares through the repurchase plan announced previously. In the Community Banking division, we stemmed a significant run-off of the commercial loan book and with the refocus on commercial and commercial real estate lending in our main footprint.

Across all divisions, we saw positive results. Now, for some of the details, please turn to slides three and four.

For the quarter, we closed a $111.2 million of loans which included $54 million of LASG commercial loan purchases and originations, $21.5 million from our new national SBA division and $35.8 million in our Community Bank division which included $28.5 million in residential loan originations. In relation to the SBA division, we sold $15.2 million of the guaranteed portion of the loans for a net gain of $1.9 million.

With $2.4 million of transactional income, the purchased loan portfolio generated a return of 13.4% and bank-wide net interest margin of 4.7%. During the quarter, we repurchased 230,726 shares of Northeast stock at an average share price of $9.86.

For the year, we closed $372.1 million of loans which included $213.2 million of LASG commercial loan purchases and originations, $33.6 million from our new national SBA division and $125.3 million in our Community Bank division which included a $104.6 million in residential loan originations. In relation to the SBA division, we sold $18.9 million of the guaranteed portion of the loan for a gain of $2.5 million.

With $9.9 million of transactional income, the purchase loan portfolio generated a return of 13.3% and bank-wide net interest margin of 4.88%. For the year, we have purchased 710,000 shares of Northeast stock at an average price of $9.38.

Turning to slide five please, as we have discussed in the past, under a regulatory commitment made in connection with the 2010 merger, purchase loans are limited to 40% of total loans. Loan purchasing capacity was 62.9 million at March 31 and 76.5 million at June 30 reflecting loan purchases of 24.8 million on balance sheet loan originations of 46.3 million and pay downs in our purchase and originated loan portfolios.

Loan purchase capacity increases or decreases depending upon the relative amount of purchase and originated loans on our balance sheet at any point in time. Now on Slide 6, under another regulatory commitment, commercial real estate loans are limited to 300% of total risk-based capital.

Capacity under this commitment was $155 million at March 31 and $137 million at June 30 reflecting commercial real estate loan activity which includes non-owner occupied purchases, originations and pay downs of $18.8 million and $123,000 impact of an increase to our regulatory capital. Moving on to Slide 7, of the $54 million invested by LASG for the quarter, $24.8 million were purchase loans and $29.2 million were originated loans.

Purchase loans for the quarter had unpaid principal balances of $25.8 million representing a purchase price of 96%. Since June of 2011 when LASG purchased its first loan, it has invested an aggregate of $624 million consisting of $387 million of purchase loans and $237 million of originated loans.

I would like to briefly comment on what we saw in the small balance performing commercial loan purchase market during the past quarter. As I noted, we purchase loans at an invested amount of $24.8 million.

During the past quarter, we reviewed loans with approximately $331 million of unpaid principal balances and bid on loans with approximately $64 million of unpaid principal balances. As I have said before, we remain disciplined in our selection underwriting and bidding on loan pools and singularly focused on building a quality portfolio.

Moving on to slide 8. At the end of the quarter the discount on purchased loans was $37.4 million, a decrease of approximately $1.6 million from the previous quarter ending March 31.

The decrease is primarily due to $17.8 million of purchased loan payoffs, offset by an increase in purchases for the quarter. Purchased loan payoffs generated $2.4 million of transactional income.

I would like to point out that approximately 72% of the $37.4 million discount is expected to be realized over the remaining life of the purchased loans through scheduled accretion. The non-accretable portion of the discount represents contractual cash flows that in our estimation may not be collectible.

Turning to slide 9, which provides detail on returns from the LASG portfolio, for the quarter the purchased portfolio generated a total return of 13.4%, including transactional income of $2.4 million from unscheduled loan payoffs and asset sales. While the return on our purchased portfolio are strong, returns on our purchased portfolio are strong it is important to emphasize that both the amount of loans purchased and the transactional income realized on the purchase portfolio may not be consistent from quarter to quarter.

With respect to the LASG originated portfolio, which does not benefit from a purchased discount, the portfolio generated returns of approximately 5.6% in the quarter. In addition, please note a yield of 0.5% on loans to broker dealers secured by securities.

Turning to slide 10, which provides some statistics on the LASG loan portfolio, as of June 30, of significance, as noted in the chart in the top right, the purchased loan portfolio has a weighted average net investment of 84%. On an invested basis, the average loan size is approximately $824,000 with the largest individual loan at $12 million.

Excluding loans to broker dealers, 17% of the portfolio consisted of loans of more than $4 million. The loan portfolio has a diverse collateral type, primarily focused on retail, industrial, office, hospitality and multi-family, and by geography with the largest concentrations in California at 18% and in New York at 17%, our collateral is geographically diverse with collateral in 36 different states.

Turning to slide 9, in previous call I have discussed our new national SBA division formed to originate loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. In the beginning of November 2014, we hired seven business development officers or BDOs in various cities around the U.S.

In our last call, I indicated that production would build over time. Originations from this division have grown from 800,000 in the second quarter 9.4 million in the third quarter, and to 25.5 million in the quarter ending June 30.

One of the benefits of the SBA program is the ability to sell the guaranteed portion of a loan and often at substantial premium. For the quarter ending June 30, the net gains on sale including the capitalized service asset was $1.9 million compared with 370,000 in the third quarter and 47,000 in the second quarter.

And now I would like to turn this over to Brian who will discuss in more detail our financial results.

Thanks Rick and good morning everyone. I’m picking it up on slide 12 to provide a little more color on our financial results.

As Rick noted, it was a solid quarter with net income of approximately $2.2 million, up $0.04 from last quarter and up significantly from $0.05 in the comparable fiscal year 2014 quarter. Results were driven in part by transactional income, which at $2.4 million was similar to last quarter's total and also by gains of $1.9 million from our national SBA division, as compared to approximately $370,000 in the prior quarter.

Turning to slide 13, over the past year, we have seen net loan portfolio growth of $96 million and 19%. The majority of the growth comes from our LASG portfolio with a $165 million of traditional purchases and originations and $48 million of loans to broker dealers.

As noted previously, the SBA originations are shown net of the sale of the guaranteed portion of the loan, which produced net gains of $2.5 million in fiscal year 2015. While loan growth has been strong, the growth has been offset by a high level of pay downs in the purchase portfolio, which averaged just over $20 million per quarter in the current fiscal year.

These results are further detailed on slide 14, which shows the composition of net loan growth over the past four quarters and this is mainly on the strength of originations by LASG, which had growth of approximately $52 million or 79% in the current fiscal year. In our Community Banking Division, residential loans in our portfolio continued to decline as we’ve been selling nearly all production into the secondary market.

In addition, the SBA loan portfolio increased to approximately $12 million at the end of the fiscal year as the majority of these loans are [indiscernible] into the secondary market. Turning to funding on slide 15, we have grown deposits by just over a $100 million or 18% over the past year and we’re up $20 million or 3.1% as compared to the prior quarter, which included a $9 million increase in our DDA balances.

For the full fiscal year, most of the increase has come in our ableBanking division’s money market product. This growth has strengthened our overall deposit mix where non-maturity accounts represent approximately 49% of total deposits, up from 40% at June 30, 2014.

Slide 16 shows trends in the main components of our income. LASG transactional income has remained relatively consistent over the past four quarters.

However, as noted historically, transactional income can vary from quarters to quarter. The table on the right highlights the trends in our non-interest income over the past five quarters.

Non-interest income has more than doubled since the prior quarter in the comparable quarter in fiscal year 2014, largely due to increases in net gains on the sale of SBA loans in the secondary market. These revenue results are further detailed on slide 17, as compared to trends in non-interest expense over the past three fiscal years.

Due to the growth in our loan book, coupled with transactional income and SBA gains, our total revenue has increased approximately $7 million since fiscal year 2014, while leveraging our existing operating structure and increasing non-interest expense by only 900,000 in the same period decreasing the efficiency ratio from 86.9% in the prior year to 73.3% in the current year. Slide 18 provides additional information on trends and yields, average balances in our net interest margin, which was 4.7%, as compared to 4.79% in the prior quarter and 4.75% in the comparable quarter of the prior fiscal year.

Turning to slide 19, the increase in residential loan volume and associated gains in the fourth fiscal quarter, reflect to rebound in the late spring and summer demand for housing inventory as compared to the prior quarter, which was affected by the unusually harsh winter in Maine. Slide 20 provides a snapshot of our asset quality metrics.

Compared to the prior quarter, credit trends have continued to improve as non-performing loans to total loans has decreased to 1.76% from 1.8% and non-performing assets to total assets has decreased to 1.46% from 1.7%. As of June 30, approximately 50% of our loans on non-accrual are current and awaiting seasoning before being placed back on accrual.

In addition, as noted on the chart on the bottom right hand corner of the slide, net charge offs to average loan balances have decreased significantly over the past several years and were 3 basis points in the trailing 12 months. That concludes our prepared remarks.

We’d like at this time to open up the call to Q&A.

Hi. Good morning.

Good morning, Alex.

Good morning, Alex.

I am sorry if I missed in your prepared remarks, Brian. But was there something in the salaries and benefits line that caused that to increase by almost $1 million over the last quarter?

Hey, Alex, this is Rick. First, good morning.

There was some – as the quarter got better, we had more incentive comp in the fourth quarter than we had in the third quarter.

[indiscernible]

I’m sorry.

That’s related to production volumes in the LASG business or is it the SBA or?

Throughout the company – as we accrue incentive comp during the year based on what we think we’re going to have based on how our performance goes and we have a – as you can see a very strong quarter and so we had more incentive comp in the fourth quarter than we had in the third quarter.

Okay. That makes sense.

And then can you give us a little bit more color on the SBA division in terms of the production they are seeing and in terms of the revenue that they are producing and whether or not do you think that the run rate that we saw in this most recent quarter is kind of a sustainable run rate or is it going to be choppy and was there any impact to that business by the SBA lending authorization ceiling that was temporarily hit during July.

Sure. First the last part of your questions I don’t forget it, there was no impact.

They shut it down for a few days and Congress then pay us the legislation which the President signed on Wednesday and we had for loans we were a PLP lender meaning we have delegated authority for most loans unless there is something that would otherwise require us to signal to the SBA to approve. We can do it on our own.

And so as we were working on credits, we have pulled the number for those which gave us the ability to close those if we calculate. So there was no impact on us at all.

There would have been impact though had the delays until October 01 which has led at some point, some people were talking about and I think it mostly would have been timing rather than permanent differences. We still have been working on credits.

You just have credits that otherwise closed in August and September that would have closed in October probably, but there was no impact at all for us. With respect to the business, we hired as you’ve heard us say in a bunch of occasions seven BDOs on November 02 in a group which we refer to it as our national SBA origination business.

It’s led by Jonathan Smith and we are looking for BDOs generally that can originate, once they get going which takes a few months north of $12 million or $13 million in some cases larger than that. And so I would say that what we saw refer everyone back to forward-looking statement, but what we saw in the fourth quarter for volume is what we would reasonably hope to see at least going forward.

One of the things that we – as we moved into that business, we thought it was a very good move based on our ability to underwriting service national credits that we would have the ability to do that with SBA loans, but in a way it’s complementary to our purchase business because it’s an origination business with more predictable flow around it. It is not the same in any given quarter of cause that number couldn’t change, but I think for you're modeling purposes that’s a reasonably good baseline.

As we go through the year to the extent we hire more BDO’s and that number changes you will have a chance to see that on a quarterly basis and adjust.

Okay that’s incredibly helpful. And then my final question just as you look at some of the trends in the LASG purchase market one thing that looks like it’s starting to become a trend is just the purchase discount, which has been lessening or decreasing kind of over the past couple of quarters and the discount was only 3.5% in this most recent quarter, is that something that’s indicative of pricing in the market or is there some seasonality in there, can you maybe talk to sort of what you expect to see in pricing and may be kind of relate that back to where you start coming out of the last cycle in the 90s?

Well I think now for the - I mean what you said was accurate for the quarter, I think was 96, give or take you may that we purchased, I think for the year I want to say was $0.80 and the market’s changed there is in a better credit timing, there are a lot of lenders that are competing for loans and there is a lot of - the buyers that were previously buying non-performing I mean that market has slowed down incredibly and now on bigger approvals they are coming in and giving, on the performing loans that we’re looking at and in some cases, while we have cheaper funding generally and we are collateral constraint on how much we will bid, it was a general rule we won’t bid more than $0.80 of the collateral value. So we, for example, if you look at a pool of loans where there has been good payment as for the last couple of years and we were private citizens with your own money and in this business you can make a reasonable investment at, believing it’s going to continue, but as a regulated bank when we're looking at loans secured by real estate collateral, we have guidelines as to how much we're going to bid.

So, if that is a long way of saying it is getting more competitive for sure, but on a more upbeat and a more rounded discussion that I would make this point, one, relative to our size it’s a very big supply still. We were not looking to, you know we bought $80 million about in FY14 and we did $83 million invested in FY15.

And if we are able to buy $80 million to $00 million based on the other business lines we have, it is very good, and even if you buy at a lower discount not so much 96, but if you buy something for $92 million and they pay you off in 18 months, you know you are still getting a big yield on that, but I think I would want to - I think the fairest thing to say is I have started with is getting more competitive and there is more compression, I do believe we will buy our fair share and I believe that we will still achieve above market returns compared to our other alternatives in life.

Great, thanks for all the color.

Thank you, Alex.

Thank you. And again, thank you all of you for participating.

Alex, thank you for your good questions, I guess between your questions and my unnecessarily lengthy response we covered a lot of ground. And again thank you everyone for your support and we look forward to talking again next quarter if not sooner.

Thank you.