Thank you, operator. By now, everyone should have access to our second quarter 2022 earnings release, which is available on the NeoGames website at www.neogames.com in the Investor Relations section.

Before we begin our formal remarks, we need to remind everyone that the discussion today will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements, which are usually identified by use of words such as will, expect, anticipate, should or other similar phrases, are not guarantees of future performance.

These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect. And therefore, you should exercise caution when interpreting and relying on them.

We refer all of you to our recent SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition. We encourage investors to review our regulatory filings including the Form 6-K for the quarter ended June 30, 2022, when it is filed with the SEC.

During today’s call, we will discuss non-IFRS financial measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating the company’s financial performance. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with IFRS.

A reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures is available in our earnings release on the neogames.com website. Hosting the call today, we have Moti Malul, NeoGames’ Chief Executive Officer; and Raviv Adler, Chief Financial Officer of the company.

They will provide some opening remarks, and then we will open the call to questions. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Moti.

Thank you, Jacques, and good morning everyone. Last night we released our second quarter 2022 results.

This morning, I will highlight some key points about the second quarter and provide an update on our current business initiatives and the trends we are seeing in the market. Raviv will then run through our financial results, which we recognize a bit more complex this quarter than in the past due to the Aspire transaction.

Overall, we had a very exciting and productive quarter. Of course, the most significant development since we last spoke is that we completed the tender offer for the outstanding shares of Aspire Global on June 16.

In total, over 99% of shares in Aspire were tendered. The less than 1% remaining outstanding are subject to a squeeze-out proceedings, which we expect will be completed shortly.

With the tender behind us, the real work begins as we have positioned ourselves in such a prominent position that enables us to become a global leader in providing technology and content across iLottery and online Sports Betting, and iGaming to our lottery customers and to leading online gaming operators in regulated markets. We are very excited about this transformational combination from a number of important perspectives.

First, our technology and product offering for lotteries are now unmatched. Second, we have strategic and significant growth opportunities across iLottery, online Sports Betting and iGaming, which have a combined TAM of over $70 million that together with our combined track records of profitable growth opens up even more opportunities ahead.

We continue to be focused on markets with attractive potential and significant barriers to entry. And with the addition of our talented colleagues from Aspire, we have a broad, experienced and innovative management team that we believe places us in the position to lead the industry.

We are hardest work integrating the teams and our operations, and we are realizing more growth potential synergies as we progress in the process. There are lots of things to be done.

However, even as we are early in – early phases of the integration, we are happy to report that the combination is already there in fruit. When we announced the Aspire transaction earlier this year, one of the key reasons for putting our two companies together were some of the trends we were seeing with our lottery customers, where more and more lottery in globally are expanding into additional verticals within their online offering, specifically online Sports Betting and iGaming operations.

From our perspective, the ability to provide a full range of products combined with our experience in operating across all verticals is becoming increasingly important. To that end, we announced a multi-year turnkey project with the existing lottery operator in Brazil’s second largest state of Minas Gerais, expanding our reach to an additional 21 million people.

With this agreement, we have added a new turnkey lottery customer and entered a very attractive new market. We are excited about this opportunity for several reasons.

First, this will be our first launch of eInstant games and online sport betting in the regulated market in Brazil. And in fact, it is the first one in the entire Brazilian market.

Second, this puts us in a great position for future opportunities. As Brazil continues to regulate lotteries state by state, and develop other forms of regulated gaming.

And third, we have found this to be an advanced market with access to innovative ePayment solutions and overall high eCommerce adaptations, which usually suggests a good foundation for iLottery and iGaming operations. In the end, we won the business because we were able to offer a comprehensive digital solution.

A solution that provides our advanced NeoSphere platform market proven eInstant content from our in-house iLottery game studio and a complete online sport betting solution with BtoBet. Together, our offering was what our new partner needed to achieve its goal of building on the successful retail lottery and digital keynote program available in the state and expanding further with a wider online portfolio.

This is precisely the type of business we envisioned we could win. When we conveyed, the key strategic benefits of the Aspire transaction earlier this year.

We have started the project already with our talented teams and we expect to go live in Brazil during the first half of next year. In addition to Brazil, we are seeing the benefits in other areas of the world.

In Canada, at the end of 2021, we added Pariplay content aggregation solution for play Alberta. And we have launched a suite of content from its in-house studio Wizard Games, which have been quite popular with the players and growing its market share.

Recently Pariplay continues that success and expanded its presence in Canada, entering into an agreement with the Canadian Atlantic Lottery to offer its Fusion content aggregation platform and gains from Wizard studio throughout the region. Then last week, we entered into an agreement through BtoBet with SOJOGO the lottery provider in Mozambique.

SOJOGO is majority owned by Santa Casa Global, which is the global arm of our longstanding customer the Portuguese lottery, a relationship we were excited to expand. In this case, we are entering a new lottery market with our BtoBet offerings and providing our proprietary sport book solution for both online operations and the retail network.

Looking forward, we feel really good about having all these various offerings at our disposal as we look to expand our global presence. Looking at our results with quarter.

The total revenues, plus our NPI revenue interest increased to $31.3 million, including approximately $8.3 million of revenues from Aspire. Even when excluding Aspire, the quarter’s results were up 7.6% year-over-year and up 2.6% compared to the first quarter of 2022.

The revenues from Aspire nominated functional currency euro grew 17% year-over-year, as well as 5.5% sequentially from the first quarter, this results highlighted strong trends we are seeing in both areas of the business. Moving to a few updates on our various business areas.

We are happy to report that all of our turnkey accounts in the U.S., Canada, and Europe posted quarter-over-quarter revenue growth, despite difficult seasonality during the second quarter. Michigan continues to perform in line with our expectations posting nice sequential growth compared to the prior quarter, and continuing the positive trends in the account.

Results in Canada through the AGLC continue to perform well and show sequential roles as I touched upon earlier. Virginia(2) continues to impressively outperform in the current environment as the account innovates in many areas, launching advanced marketing programs and expand its product portfolios.

Turning to the Aspire side of the business. We are taking great strides in integrating the Aspire segments.

For the Aspire core business, which provides full iGaming solutions, including our PAM technology and managed services to iGaming operators in regulated markets. We signed two new full product and managed services deals in European regulated markets with B2C operators.

On the sport betting side, we are experiencing increased momentum in the development of this business area. In line with a long term plan to enter the U.S.

market, we are pleased to announce that BtoBet sport betting platform is now certified with GLI-33 as an Events Wagering System, which practically means that our sports betting platform is certified to operate in the North American market. As such, we now have our PAM certified and live in 50 markets and our sport betting platform is ready for B2B sport deals.

In addition through BtoBet, we expand our presence in Africa, a market where it already has a dominant position with its sport betting technology, partnering with UtopBet, the Ethiopian retail and online brand for which BtoBet will provide its propriety for sports book platform and risk management. We expect to launch early next year, which will expand our market dominant presence in Africa to 27 countries.

Our content aggregation and iGaming arm Pariplay continues to perform very well and continues its growth in all its business areas. Pariplay signed 12 new partnerships to provide content aggregation and gains, including with industry leaders, such as BetMGM, which went live with games from Wizard studio in Michigan and New Jersey, as well as the deal with DraftKings in the U.S.

To Pariplay we also expanded our relationship with Caesars to provide our gains and aggregation in the U.S. and Ontario in Canada.

Turning to the macro environment outlook. While there seems to be possibility of a recession, we would like to remind everyone that lottery is typically an industry that has been less impacted during similar macro related environments.

With this in mind, we’re currently not seeing any impact to any of our business lines as a result of the macro environment. However, we will continue to monitor as the economy develops.

With that, I’ll now turn the call over to Raviv.

Thanks, Moti. Before I get into the results, two comments.

First, our usual reminder that when we discuss our results, I would point out that all of our iLottery business in North America operates through our 50/50 joint venture NeoPollard Interactive or NPI except in Michigan, which is reflected in our top-line revenues. Our contract in Virginia, New Hampshire, North Carolina, in the province of Alberta run through NPI.

Except for the NPI contracts, we conduct all of our business through NeoGames. As a result from an accounting standpoint, as many of you know, we generate revenue and earnings through our only owned operation and through our equity interest in NPI.

Now turning to the results. During the second quarter of 2022, our revenues as reported on the income statement, which excludes our share of NPI revenues was $21.1 million, including an $8.3 million contribution from Aspire Global up 63.4% from last year.

In addition, our share of NPI revenue grew to $10.3 million during the second quarter of 2022, compared with $8.5 million last year up 20.6%. The sum total of these numbers were $31.3 million during the second quarter, representing an increase of about 46.4% year-over-year.

On the expense side, it’s worth noting that second quarter earnings were impacted by some one-time items. The primary item was $14.2 million of non-recurring transaction related expenses related to the Aspire tender offer.

For the quarter, our adjusted EBITDA was $10.3 million, which includes $1.3 million contribution from Aspire Global from June 16, through the end of the quarter. Excluding the partial quarter contribution, the NeoGames adjusted EBITDA margin was $39.2 million.

As a reminder, when evaluating the combined adjusted EBITDA margins, it’s important to consider that the results reflect that Aspire historically structured certain parts of the business in contract such that revenues recognized on a growth basis. These results in higher revenue and lower margins when compared to the historical NeoGames business, where revenues is recognized on a net basis.

Going forward as part of the integration with Aspire, we’re considering options to orient the business and its respective contracts to move closer to net. If we’re successful over time, this may result in expansion of margins for the combined financials.

Of course, we will keep investors updated of any decisions we make in these disclosures going forward. In addition, when evaluating the revenues we’re adding from Aspire Global business, it’s important to note that going forward, our results may be affected by currency exchange rate fluctuations given the majority of added Aspire revenues are euros on British bounds nominated.

For instance, if we look at Aspire Global revenues for the six months year-to-date in dollars, revenues were up approximately 9.5%. This change reflects the increase of – an increase of $21.4 in revenues measured in euros, partially offset by the currency changes in the euro dollar exchange rates.

We will work to mitigate these impacts and provide transparency on how these affect our results. Turning to our balance sheet.

We ended this quarter with about $129 million worth of cash and cash equivalents. Our outstanding debt at the quarter end was approximately $266 million at the weighted average interest rate of 6.25%.

We have approximately 33.3 million shares outstanding. In addition, current liability label deferred payment on business combination for $96.3 million represent cash consideration to be paid to shareholders as part of the tender offer.

That’s when looking on our cash balance, it’s appropriate to offset amount due to shareholders for analytical purposes. With respect to guidance, we’re updating our expectations to reflect successful completion of the Aspire Global tender on June 16.

As a result we’re currently – we currently expect revenue in our share of NPI interest for the full year of 2022 to be in the range of $194 million to $208 million. The range reflects our previously provided guidance range, which remains unchanged together with the contribution of revenues from Aspire Global beginning from when the tender offer was closed on June 16 to December 31.

With that, I will turn the call back to Moti.

Thanks, Raviv. Overall, this was such an exciting quarter for us.

With true transformational change in our business that we were so pleased to show our investor base, how fast we are leveraging into new business. We truly believe we are in a great position to continue executing on our growth strategy for both iLottery and iGaming opportunities and are excited by the momentum we are generating.

Thank you all as always for your interest in our story. With that operator, please open the line for questions.

Hey, good morning, Moti, Raviv. Good to hear from you both and congrats on getting the Aspire deal across the finish line here.

Thank you, Jeff.

I wanted to start there on the acquired business. So, we’re going on just about two months now, that you closed on the deal.

Just curious if there’s anything there that’s sort of caught you by surprise thus far or kind of any key incremental takeaways now that you’ve had, eight weeks or so to look behind the curtain a bit?

No, nothing caught us by surprise. As we said, we are very much encouraged by what we keep finding in terms of potential growth synergies, even more so than we had before, as we go deeper and deeper into different product areas, geographic strength and existing customers that we could leverage between each other.

But we can’t say that we’ve learned anything to surprise us.

Perfect. That’s helpful.

And then hanging on that theme of kind of top-line synergies between the two businesses, congrats on the recent deal down in Brazil, bit of a two part here. First, just how should we think about timing for launch and for ramp, and then second how impactful did it end up proving having the BtoBet assets when you went to compete for that contract?

Start from the end, it was very impactful because it allowed us to price in a sensitive way and be aligned fully aligned with their interest. Unlike whether we would’ve worked with a potential partner on the B2B side for such a deal, plus what’s even more exciting is that now we have the in-house operational knowledge to make this a success and not only provide a product and the synergies between the marketing team and the operations on the lottery side and the sports side are expected to bring very good growth potentials for that deal.

When it comes to timeline, as we said, we were careful to say, first half of next year; we will obviously do our best to try to do it on the earlier part of that than later. But the reason that we can’t be accurate is because we are breaking new grounds here.

There is no regulated sport betting brand in the Brazilian market and not even an online instant game. So, we’re happy to work very closely with the relevant regulators and with our customers to define – to define what needs to be tested and checked and so on.

But as you can understand, these may take a little bit longer, because we are busy writing the book and that, that’s why we couldn’t at this point of time, be more specific, but when Q3 comes and we will report to the market, we will be smarter and maybe we’ll provide a more accurate date for go live.

That’s helpful. Thank you, Moti.

And if I could just squeeze in a third and hang on the subject, just on Brazil, obviously kind of a state by state rollout process there up to each one individually, just, are you hearing anything on any other states potentially opening up in the market, whether iLottery only, sports betting only or broader package?

Definitely. There are quite a few processes that even gain the public awareness.

For example a couple of states like São Paulo, which is the biggest one had started the procurement process or an RFP to find a concession that will manage the lottery in that state. And also sports betting licenses.

It was paused from legal reasons and maybe expected to reinitiate like many things in Brazil post the election this year, those election also in Brazil, not only in the U.S. and many things are a bit posed up until then.

And apart from that, which has been in the spotlight, there has been other processes, Rio de Janeiro had of process and two or three other states. And I remind you that there are quite a few states in Brazil, which are decent size in terms of population, 10 million people give or take.

Some of them have even bigger and obviously our state, our customer state is 21 million people. So, we definitely think that in the next year 2023, it could be there two, that two or three other states will already be at the point that they are going to seek for vendors or concessions.

Very helpful. Thank you very much.

I’ll pass it on.

Thank you, Jeff.

Great. Hey guys.

Look, I know you haven’t given any specific numbers, but maybe can you help us as we try to quantify the synergies with the combination, I mean really what’s the best way to think about upside from here versus how we were modeling the standalone Aspire and NeoGames businesses?

Thank you, Barry for the question. We didn’t provide any synergies on the revenue side, although as Moti pointed out.

There are quite few and one of them is the, is the most recent Brazil contract. We also do have some pretty significant cost synergies associated with the fact that we’re no longer using, the content provider of Pariplay as cost on our books, as well as other consolidation of facilities and some other factors that associated with the OpEx structures of the, of both businesses that can be now removed from our P&L.

That being said, we didn’t provide to the market, any particular guidance or numbers, because we’re, busy in the integration process and bringing those forward. And once we have a complete figures, we will provide that to the market as part of our guidance.

Okay. That’s definitely helpful, but I mean, I guess, should we expect this to be more visible in 2023 in terms of the cost side of the equation and everything you’ve, we should think about this year as sort of as is.

Correct. We will have some few, but it’s relatively minor while we report, when we report Q3 numbers and we will have, we can be more specific on the cost synergies for 2023.

That’s great. And then I think relating to Jeff’s question about new jurisdictions, I’m just curious any updates from a U.S.

iLottery perspective, you didn’t touch on whether that’s Ohio, Massachusetts, or any other states.

Yes, generally speaking, as you guys can imagine, the processes that have been active in some of the markets, some of those processes are kind of paused a bit until the elections such could be the case in Ohio that, that passed a significant milestone in last quarter, but probably wait for post-election time to continue that process. And so is the case in other states, I would say that in this last quarter, we did see let’s say the most, the most progress that has been achieved thus far in Massachusetts when it comes to moving, iLottery forward, by the way as always pretty much in connection with moving sports betting or other forms of gaming while it didn’t get passed as a bill because it doesn’t necessarily need to, it has passed certain legislation milestones with different committees in the states.

So, I think that that has been something that hasn’t happened for years, and it shows that this is on legislator’s agenda. Apart from that, the other processes that has not yet passed full approval are probably paused a bit until the elections and we relaunch after that.

Great. And if I could just sneak in one more, within the Aspire business, can you maybe talk about what you’re seeing across the key geographies, whether that’s the UK or Germany or any other countries?

Yes, definitely Aspire performed well this quarter, as you could have seen from the reports, our expectation that this will continue to be the case. I think the, the things that we are mostly anticipating for in the second half of the year, and are still not fully clear is the point of time where the reentry to two key markets in Europe, which are moving into local regulation, which are Germany and Holand, what will be the exact point of time that that is happening because that’s in the end of the regulators, that is probably also one factor that influences the range of guidance that we gave.

But obviously it’s just a matter of time. And if those markets will, will open up a little bit later in the year or so, they will be expected to impact our growth potential into next year.

Great. All right.

Thank you so much.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the closing of the deal.

Wanted to ask one more on the revenue guidance. You’ve hit on this a couple times, but I just wanted to make sure we’re thinking about it correctly.

I believe the implied guide for Aspire in the back half the year is around a $100 million just based on, what you generated in the first half and your reiteration of the legacy business. So, I believe that kind of assumes double-digit same store constant currency growth.

And you just talked about that. That’s what Aspire was able to generate in the second quarter, just wanted to confirm that.

And then also related, I believe last year Aspire was slightly stronger in the third quarter, but this fourth quarter will obviously have the World Cup. So, as we’re thinking about seasonality in the back half, should we assume that it’s closer to kind of, even in terms of the waiting?

Thanks.

Yes. Sure.

Thank you. So first to first question that’s correct.

If you are moving Aspire contribution to the guidance, the range that you’ve quoted is the right one. Obviously, the World Cup would impact the expected revenues from Aspire during Q4.

And this is the reason why we gave relatively high range from the lower side to the end, to the upper side of the guidance. One important note when we’re talking about Aspire revenues is something that also touched on our commentary to the quarter, is the fact that, currency fluctuation, especially this year and the fact that the Aspire business by the vast majority is nominated in euros or GBP, British pounds, that would impact also the revenues expectations.

And this is again, another reason for the relatively high range of the upper to the lower end of the bar.

Okay, perfect. Appreciate that.

And then with respect to the consumer, it sounds like its pretty stable particularly with the North American contracts. Did you start to see any growing weakness, sequentially throughout the quarter as inflation picked up and prices at the pump increased, or was it relatively stable throughout the three months in the quarter?

Chad, as we, as I mentioned in the opening remarks, we haven’t seen any impact at all, not only in the U.S., but also in Europe. We can’t say that this will be the case going forward.

We just reminded everyone that, the lottery industry has proved to be a bit less impactful than other industries in times of financial macroeconomics environment, like in 2008 and in 2009. The other lines of businesses, there’s no such history to learn from, but for the moment we haven’t seen any down trends as a result of macroeconomics in the online business.

Great. Appreciate it.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Could you help us think about kind of the opportunity in Brazil?

How does the kind traditional lottery in Brazil compare to U.S. in terms of spend capital or players behavior?

Yes, first of all, Cassandra it’s, we know it’s tricky. We understand it’s tricky because we have very little to grab on when we model that country, since as I’ve mentioned, we are pretty much breaking grounds.

There are no similar regulated online activities to learn from, even the numbers that exist from the single lottery in Brazil that has been selling, some sort of jackpot products on a federal scale is really little to learn from, because it hasn’t been a high yield or a per capital market, for the decades that it exists from reasons that it would probably take long to explain, but it’s definitely not a lottery, not our customer. I mean, the federal lottery in Brazil Caixa has not been high performing in the global industry to say, to say the least.

So the little to learn from. What we are encouraged from is definitely what we have been able to learn on the environmental aspect that makes us believe that this is something that that could be quite interesting.

The access and the usage of eCommerce, electronic payments and everything online has boosted to an unbelievable level in the country during COVID, I have to say probably even more advanced than in other countries in Western Europe or even some aspects of U.S. So, we feel that there’s very solid grounds for adaptation of online channels, but we understand that it’s difficult to model.

I think that we have to go live and when we will be like, three months or so live, we will start to get a feel of players spend in the first months of activity and then be able to compare and build a model out from there. But at this point of time, it’s difficult for us to grab into anything that would provide us with a reasonable benchmark.

That is really helpful. Thank you, Moti.

And if I may ask another one, how should we think about your sport betting business margin compared to iLottery? I understand when you are the sole operators in a jurisdiction you don’t have the same kind of pressure in terms of promoting or free play, but still want you to get your thoughts on that.

Yes. Thank you, Cassandra.

So the sport book business is the margin profile and given that it includes also, certain trading services and other factors of course, that we not necessarily see in the side of iLottery. And the margin profile would be a little bit lower than, the traditional iLottery programs.

So if we were, if we’re assuming or hoping to see in NeoGames as iLottery provider trades that around high 30s, low 40s, then the sports book should be expected the somewhere between the 25% to 30% gross margin in terms of operation.

Got it. Thank you very much and congrats on the deal and the new contract.

Thank you.

Thank you, Cassandra.

Thank you. Yes, nothing to hold everyone on the line.

Thank you for the continued interest in our story and company as always. And we hope to continue to bring growth in the next quarters to come and we’re very excited with the opportunity.

Thank you everyone. Have a day.