Thank you for joining us for NETSTREIT's fourth quarter and full year 2020 earnings conference call. In addition to the press release distributed yesterday after market close, we posted a supplemental package and an updated investor presentation.

Those can be found in the Investor Relations section of the company's Web site at www.netstreit.com. On today's call, management's remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those discussed today. For more information about these risk factors, we encourage you to review our prospectus dated August 13, 2020, and our other SEC filings, including our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 available.

All forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof, and NETSTREIT assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. In addition, certain financial information presented on this call includes non-GAAP financial measures.

Please refer to our earnings release and supplemental package for definition, GAAP reconciliations and an explanation of why we believe such non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors. Today’s conference call is hosted by NETSTREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Mark Manheimer; and Chief Financial Officer, Andy Blocher.

They will make some prepared remarks and then we will open the call for your questions. Now I will turn the call over to Mark.

Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining us today for NetSTREIT's fourth quarter and full year 2020 earnings call.

We hope this call finds you and your families well and we are pleased to be here with you today. I'll start with a brief overview of our accomplishments over the last year.

Then I'll discuss our acquisition and portfolio management activity and close with a few comments on ESG related efforts. Andy will then provide more detail on our fourth quarter and full year results, balance sheet and outlook for 2021.

We will then open the call for questions. Since our inception NETSTREIT’s strategy has been to create a high quality diversified and fortress NETSTREIT retail portfolio, with a conservatively capitalized balance sheet and scalable platform to support accretive and consistent long term cashflow growth.

As many of you are aware, we spent the first half of 2020 deploying capital raised from our private rule 144-A offering. We built a portfolio that was e-commerce resistant and recession resilient, which ultimately helped us to have significantly higher rent collections as compared to our net lease peers during the second and third quarters of 2020, at the height of COVID-19 related closures.

In addition, we built out our team from eight employees to 19. We made several executive hires, including Andy Blocher, Trish McCartney and Randy Howe, who are on this call with us today.

We also hired Chad Shaffer as our SVP of Credit and Underwriting. We added three members to our board of directors, Robin Ziglar, Heidi Everett and Michael Christodolou.

We believe we have a best in class team in place to lead us forward. We successfully completed our IPO last August amid the COVID-19 pandemic, raising a total of $227 million of net proceeds, which included the over allotment option exercised by our underwriters.

I would like to pause here to take a moment to note that many of last year's accomplishments wouldn't have happened had it not been for every member of our team who worked diligently to get us to where we are today. I'm very proud of everyone and I look forward to sharing more successes with them in the future.

Moving on to our portfolio. As of December 31, 2020, our portfolio contain 203 properties comprising 3.7 million square feet in 38 states with a diversified tenant roster of 56 tenants in 23 industries.

Our weighted average lease term is 10.5 years and we are 100% occupied with no lease expirations until 2023 and less than 1% of our leases expiring before 2025. Based on ABR, our tenancy is 70% investment grade with an additional 8% classified as unrated with an investment grade profile, and over 90% of our industry exposure is what we refer to as defensive.

But simply we focus on well positioned tenants who have strong balance sheets and great access to capital, and are focused on tenants for whom their physical locations are integral to their ability to generate cash flow for their business. This defining characteristic has proven to be a key protection against both e-commerce risks and COVID related disruption.

As a result, our collections have been extremely strong throughout the COVID pandemic. We collected approximately 97% of our rent for the full year of 2020.

Andy will discuss further. But we believe that these results validate our strategic approach to portfolio construction and resulting COVID related rent payment disruptions are now in the rear view mirror.

Throughout 2020, we continued to grow our portfolio through disciplined acquisitions. As a reminder, we underwrite and acquire properties with strong underlying tenant credit and seek fungible real estate with strong market fundamentals and locations that are highly productive for the parent tenant.

In 2020, we completed $409 million of acquisitions. The depth and breadth of our pipeline meant that we kept a steady pace of acquisitions throughout the year with no slowdown due to COVID.

This activity included investments in stabilized assets, blend and extend opportunities, sale leaseback transactions and development projects, which demonstrates the depth of our opportunity set. For the fourth quarter, we completed $81 million of acquisitions at an initial cash capitalization rate of 6.8%.

These acquisitions had a weighted average remaining lease term of 8.8 years with 68.7% of the properties occupied by investment grade rated tenants, and an additional 12% occupied by tenants with investment grade profile. Finally, with respect to timing, these acquisitions were back the loaded in the quarter, which tends to be the case in most quarters.

During the fourth quarter, we added a few new tenants to our portfolio roster, including Best Buy, Sunbelt rentals and our first 15 year Chick-fil-A ground lease. We also added our first Target in Massachusetts just south of Boston to the portfolio at a 6.4% cap rate, subject to a seven year ground lease with rent of just $2.81 per square foot.

The adjacent former Sears box has been demolished and Trammell Crow has begun construction on a luxury Class A 282 unit apartment community in its place. Not only are we encouraged by the new customers that will be moving in next door in the next couple of years, but also by the increasing land value that we expect on our three and half acre parcel that we acquired at what we feel was a bargain price.

We also continue to consider strategic dispositions to improve portfolio quality and reduce risk. In 2020, we sold 15 properties for $50 million of which 12 properties and $37.4 million were closed in the fourth quarter.

We felt that market conditions in the fourth quarter presented an attractive opportunity to eliminate or lessen our exposure to certain tenants, geographies and industries, and improved our overall credit quality. This drove our decision to sell these assets sooner rather than later despite their near term impact on absolute earnings.

During the fourth quarter, we took an opportunity to reduce our exposure to casual dining, which has been a stated goal of ours. This exposure was reduced from 4.5% to 2.2% during 2020.

We believe that we have now addressed the immediate potential credit risks in this category, but we'll continue to decrease exposure in this category over time. We also look to refine our geographic exposure, and to date have done so in a way that was a creative.

During the fourth quarter, we sold an ally in Texas at a 6.4% cap rate and replaced it with an acquisition of another ally in Indiana with similar remaining lease term at a 7.8% cash cap rate. As a result of our active capital recycling and portfolio management in 2020, we transformed our existing portfolio, enhancing its credit quality and improving diversity.

We acquired 124 total assets, adding 23 new tenants, 10 new states and four new industries. Importantly, our percentage of investment grade tenants grew from 63.7% to 70% and our weighted average lease term grew from 10.1 to 10.5 years.

At the same time, we reduced ABR exposure to our largest tenant, which was BBB rated CVS at 11.8% of ABR on December 31, 2019 to AA minus rated 7-Eleven at 8.9% as of December 31, 2020. We continue to evaluate future acquisitions, including with many of our top 10 tenants.

However, over time, we expect tenant concentration to decrease due to the denominator effect as our portfolio continues to grow. Finally, let me remind you that we have zero exposure to theater, health club or early childhood education tenants, reflecting our long held view that these tenants have generally weaker tenant credit profiles and lack of fungibility of their underlying real estate.

As we look ahead, we're targeting that acquisition activity inclusive of dispositions of $320 million in 2021. We expect that the bulk of this activity will be a mix of investment grade and high quality unrated tenants that is similar to our current portfolio mix, and reflect the current mix of our industry concentrations.

Given the sheer size of the net leased sector and our deep industry relationships, we believe we have plenty of growth opportunities ahead of us. And due to our relative smaller size, we know that future acquisitions can move the needle for us in terms of earnings growth in a meaningful way.

We continue to improve our portfolio quality and diversification with no erosion and going in cash cap rates or weighted average lease term. We were encouraged by our robust and growing pipeline of opportunities as we look forward to reaching our 2021 acquisitions goals with high quality properties.

As this is our fourth quarter call, let me take a brief moment to cover an important topic here, ESG. When we came to market at the time of our IPO, we indicated that ESG would be a part of our strategy and processes.

First, we are committed to strong governance. From the time of our IPO, we ensured that our board was designed to fit today's standards for governance.

We have an independent and diverse board with a strong mix of backgrounds and expertise, including real estate, financial markets and human capital. These are the same three pillars that support NETSTREIT itself.

Second, from the beginning, employee wellbeing and engagement has been and remains very important to Andy and me. From a social perspective, we make sure that NETSTREIT offers professional training, continuing education reimbursement, competitive benefits and flexible parental leave to our employees.

We also survey employee satisfaction annually. I'm proud to say that every one of our employees is a shareholder in NETSTREIT, meaning all of our employees have a personal stake in our collective success.

Finally, with respect to the environment, 17 of our top 20 tenants have corporate sustainability programs, and our acquisition due diligence process has an ESG and environmental component. At the asset level, we look to fund capital improvement projects with an eye towards sustainability.

We are very proud of all that we've accomplished in 2020, having significantly grown our portfolio while improving its quality, and built an operating platform designed for growth, supported by a low leverage balance sheet. Finally, our strong performance on collections objectively proves that the durability of our strategy as we meaningfully outperformed our peer set in an unforeseen, uncertain economic environment over the past year.

As a result, we believe we are extremely well positioned as we enter 2021 and we are excited for the future at NETSTREIT. I'll now turn the call over to Andy.

Andy?

Thanks, Mark, and thank you all for your time with us this morning. Let me begin with our results for the fourth quarter and full year 2020.

Yesterday, in our press release, we reported net income of $0.15, core FFO of $0.18 and AFFO of $0.20 per diluted share for the fourth quarter. For the full year, we reported net income of $0.01, core FFO of $0.65 and AFFO of $0.69 per diluted share.

As of December 31, 2020, the in place portfolio was generating $41.8 million of annualized base rent or ABR which has important time metric reflects the effect of acquisitions and dispositions completed in the fourth quarter. From a collections perspective, we're very pleased with our portfolio performance.

Prior to giving any consideration to deferral or abatement arrangements, granted as a result of COVID, we collected 100% of fourth quarter rent payments and for the full year collected 96.9% of rent. Further, based on the payment history of our tenants, we currently have zero bad debt reserves and recognize zero bad debt in the fourth quarter and for the full year of 2020.

Finally, based on our 100% rent collections in the fourth quarter, we did not provide any deferrals or abatements and have not done so since August. Turning our balance sheet and our capital markets activity.

The work we completed in 2020 with respect to our balance sheet was very important and set the stage for future growth for NETSTREIT. We access the equity markets and raised net proceeds of approximately $227 million through our IPO in August.

We repaid our outstanding line of credit, retired our outstanding Series A preferred shares and completed $175 million LIBOR swap to hedge floating rate exposure on the entire balance of our term loan. As of December 31st, we had $93 million of cash, which includes $14 million of restricted cash held in 10/31 exchange accounts, and remain fully undrawn on our $250 million revolving line of credit.

We have no debt maturities until the maturity of our revolver in December 2023, which is subject to a one year extension option, which would match the December 2024 maturity of our fully drawn term loan. In addition, our net debt to annualized adjusted EBITDA ratio of 2.8 times is well below our 4.5 times to 5.5 times long term target.

With respect to dividends earlier this week, the board declared a $0.20 regular cash dividend to be payable on March 30th to shareholders of record on March 15th, reflecting an annualized dividend rate of $0.80 per share. Let me now take a few minutes to discuss our outlook on a couple of guidance items and provide some forward looking perspective.

We're starting the year with 41.8 million of in place annulized base rent. As Mark mentioned, we expect to employ 320 million of acquisitions this year, net of dispositions back end weighted in each quarter and a cap rate comparable for fourth quarter and full year 2020 activity.

We expect cash interest expense to range from $3 million to $3.5 million depending on the timing of draws, if any, on our revolving line credit and expect an additional 600,000 of noncash deferred financing fee amortization. We expect to incur states and franchise tax of $200,000 to $300,000 and expect to report those amounts on their own line item in 2021, reflecting the growth and increasing geographic diversity of our portfolio.

We expect 2021 cash G&A in the range of $11 million to $12 million, with an additional $3 million to $4 million of noncash compensation expense, which reflects executive compensation agreements that have been recently finalized through our compensation committee process. As we've largely stabilized the size of our team, our overall compensation structure and our outside service requirements to efficiently and effectively execute our strategy and perform as a public company, we expect that we will continue to gain the benefits of scale and a relatively fixed cost structure as we grow.

As a result, our G&A as a percentage of revenue and assets is expected to decrease over time. I'll echo Mark's comments and say that I'm grateful to our entire team for their exceptional contributions in 2020.

Their hard work each day through a pandemic allowed us to establish and build what we believe is a truly great platform and portfolio. As we start 2021, we believe we have significant momentum to continue to grow both our portfolio and earnings and remain focused on creating significant shareholder value.

This concludes our prepared remarks, we'll now open the line for question. Operator?

You collected 100% of rent payments for October, November and December, but we didn't see mention of rent collections for January and February in your press release. Is there anything to highlight here?

Yes, we did collect 100% of rent in January. But just to preface that question, as it relates to COVID and/or any tenant requesting any rent relief, we have not had a discussion with any tenants since the second quarter about paying rent, as we had hoped and still believe that we have fully resolved and documented all COVID impacts to the portfolio last year going back to the second quarter.

But this February, we had an investment grade tenant send us our rent check but we never received it. And so we the tenant canceled the check and then move that tenant to ACH, so which we're trying to do with all of our tenants.

And we've got all the confidence that we're going to be receiving that rent from them on Tuesday, which is the day of the week that they released all their wires. And we'll continue to collect 100% of a rent, not only for February but for the rest of the first quarter.

But we wanted to be really hyper careful when it comes to transparency and maintaining our credibility. So technically, we're waiting on one rent payment of $23,000 to get to 100% in February, and that would make our sixth consecutive month of receiving every penny of rent.

So hopefully that answered your question.

And then we're also seeing a growing number of net lease transactions occur in the multitenant shopping center space with a smaller shopping center REIT announcing yesterday JV acquire high quality investment grade net lease tenants. This sounds like your sandbox.

How are you viewing the competitive landscape right now and should we be concerned about greater cap rate compression or more difficulty sourcing deals in 2021?

So first, I think it shows how attractive the spaces that we have seen couple more entrants in the last few years. But I do think that there is mention that this particular new entrant has a very specific acquisitions approach that would make it very unlikely that we'd be competing directly with them.

And again, it's just a very, very fragmented market, which was really a big topic. When we raised capital in 144A that we'd be able to deploy capital and the quality that we have at the pricing that we have, it was also a topic at the time of the IPO and it's still today.

But we think we just continue to prove our ability to compete and still be able to hit pretty attractive yields for the the quality of assets that we're bringing in. And in fact as we look forward to the pipeline, I think it's more robust today than it really has been over the past few quarters.

Just one last one. How are you approaching tenant concentration, is this best addressed through dispositions or dilution through higher acquisition volume?

I mean, obviously we're a smaller portfolio at this point. And so the majority of that is going to come through the denominator increasing in size.

With that being said, if we have one particular outsized tenant, we did sell a couple of 7-Eleven assets one at five caps and one at 495 cap back in the fourth quarter pretty accretively, which is great but we will continue to selectively work through dispositions. But you did see in the fourth quarter a little bit more dispositions than what I think you can typically expect from us on a go forward basis.

We just had an opportunity to move some tenant credits that really thought made sense to move out of the portfolio and some shorter term leases, where we felt like we were getting pricing similar to longer term leases. So we felt like that was helpful for us to improve our lease expiration schedule.

I was wondering if you could comment on the activity you've had so far in Q1, since we're already kind of approaching the end of this quarter. And you mentioned the pipeline's bigger than it's been in the last two quarters.

I was wondering if you could just help us size that in terms of dollar terms? And within that pipeline, is it mostly concepts you already own or is it a mix of new and current?

So I mean, again, I think of this quarter similar to the fourth quarter is likely to be a bit back end loaded. We closed in the neighborhood of $20 million of assets so far.

I know there's a couple that should be closing either today or early next week. We have a little bit over $120 million of assets that are under contract approved through investment committee and moving through the closing process.

So that can take anywhere from 30 to 60 days. So some of that will be in the first quarter, some of that will leak into April.

And I think the good thing there is we will have probably a pretty robust April as well. So that will kind of make the acquisitions a little bit less back end loaded that we saw in the first quarter and likely to see in the first quarter.

But yes, it relates to the tenant stuff that we're seeing. We did add a few new tenants that, as you’ve heard in my prepared remarks, Target thing being one.

We do have a couple more new tenants that I think are pretty attractive investment grade tenants that we'll be adding to the portfolio here in the first quarter. But it's gonna look a lot like what you saw in the fourth quarter in terms of investment grade and an investment grade profile, pretty high quality assets with an attractive weighted average lease term that yields that are pretty consistent with what we've done in 2020.

You mentioned some ground leases you did in the quarter. I was wondering if you could just remind us how much of your portfolio is ground leases and where -- is that going to grow over time, or kind of how did those opportunities present themselves to you?

So I mean, I think, ground leases to us are -- they're not all created equal. And when you see [Indiscernible] and some of those tenants out there that are ground leases, but there are several million dollars to acquire.

So when you look at the rent on a fee simple versus ground lease, there's really not much difference. So I don't really think you're picking up much of an advantage other than losing out on some depreciation.

But when we do see rents that are reflective of really just what the land is worth or less. Those are very attractive.

Typically, those are going to get -- and we're going to get priced out on a lot of those types of transactions. I think the Target, if that was a more effective marketing of that asset, I think cap rate would be significantly inside of the 6.4 going in cash cap rate that we acquired those.

We do have a handful of ground leases in the portfolio. I mean we've got Lowe’s which is I think a real ground lease.

Obviously, mentioned the Chik-fil-A, and we’ve got a few others, but it’s inside 5% of the portfolio. I don't really think that's going to grow meaningfully.

We don't really want to pay up for ground leases. But in the event that we find them and they’re priced similar to a few simple deals and we're coming in at low rents those are going to be pretty attractive to us.

Andy, I apologize if you covered this in your opening remarks, my call stopped for a few seconds. But just curious what prevented you from providing AFFO per share guidance this year and whether you expect that to be an abnormality this year, or kind of what we should be expecting going forward?

Yes, I mean I think that it is a 2021 phenomenon, certainly, you know, at this point. But you know, based on our current size, the assumptions that we make around, timing, size, pricing of additional capital raises, things that we talked about in the past and to a lesser extent expectations around our ordinary course business.

The range that we would have had to provide would have been so wide, it would have been meaningless to users. So what we did is I think we provided guidance around the key operational items that we really expect are going to dictate our 2021 corporate performance and rough the capital raising to the size knowing that we're going to be opportunistic with respect to our access to capital as we did throughout 2021.

So I mean for us to produce AFFO per share in the high 60s and then provide $0.10 to $0.15 guidance range as a result of those things, we just didn't think it was meaningful to users.

In regards to the capital raises though, are any updates you can provide there in terms of kind of how you're thinking about funding acquisitions this year?

I mean, as I talked about in my prepared remarks, I mean we've got $93 million worth of cash on the balance sheet as of year end. March had a very robust pipeline that we're working through.

We have a fully undrawn $250 million credit facility. We were at 2.8 times net debt to EBITDA.

So we feel like we’ve got the room. And you know as a result, we have the ability to be opportunistic with respect to capital.

You touched on your reduced casual dining exposure. But when it comes to quick service, we don't see specific names in your top tenant list.

Can you guys just comment on your appetite to buy portfolios of QSRs? Not in a central or a necessity bucket, but it sure seems that way during COVID.

Going back to when COVID first hit, we hit the brakes entirely on acquisitions for a short period of time. And similar to the great recession and see how the COVID disruption you saw, quick service restaurants performed extraordinarily well.

I mean, we're still going to be very focused on credit and there's really, probably a list of about 10 names that we're very comfortable with. As it relates to quick service restaurants and we want to make sure that we've got drive thru and we've got enough -- a large enough parcel to accommodate directors, we’re even seeing some quick service restaurant operators that historically hadn't had a drive thru or going to that model.

So we want to make sure that that's going to be the very fungible back, but it is an area, I think, you can expect to see us acquire some assets in the future. And again, as you mentioned, casual dining down to a little over 2%, I think you're likely to see that creep below 1% by year end.

You added some Best Buy, Burlington’s and some grocery stores in the quarter. Can you speak to these?

At first glance, it doesn't appear -- at least don't appear terribly fungible, maybe like the credit, maybe like location, maybe just kind of touch on these things?

I mean, I think the size boxes specific to Burlington and BestBuy, they've been really kind of decreasing the size of their box. So we were in pretty close communication with attendance on those particular assets and how committed they are to those long term, generating very strong sales at each of them.

So we are fairly confident that those particular tenants are likely to remain in those boxes beyond their initial lease term. But that being said, there are a lot of tenants in kind of that 35,000 to 40,000 square foot range.

And so we feel that those are actually fairly easy for us to either replace the rent or increase the rent should we be put in a position to re-pat tenant.

Last one for me, just with this year of kind of a backdrop, there's commentary out there just there’s increased M&A activity potential. Where do you guys stand on doing sale leasebacks?

Do you think that'll be a part of your strategy, or you think you're going to be more highly widely marketed space?

So hopefully not in the widely marketed space, because I feel like the pricing gets awfully competitive and a little bit less attractive. But that being said, last year I was asked a lot of different questions related to how we source acquisitions.

We really do have a lot of different ways that we approach the acquisition side, whether they’d be blend and extends, whether it's partnering with a multitenant buyer and where we pull up the net lease, or on the development side or even sales leasebacks. I did not really expect at that time to be doing many sale leasebacks.

As you typically see those as being a tenant that doesn't have great access to capital, resource to selling their real estate, to kind of leaseback really leveraging themselves and put that -- and maybe not a great position long term on the credit profile. That being said, we've seen a large number of investment grade high quality tenants that just don't want to have their capital tied up in the real estate, and have seen an increasing list of opportunities within some of those tenants that we like and think are really strong performers.

So we have done a little bit more than what I think we expected, and there's even some of that in our go forward pipeline.

This is [Indiscernible] for Katy. I guess I was just curious about how you guys are thinking about inflation sort of, I think it's been a key topic that's come up over the past few weeks, and sort of keeping in mind where you're at least escalators are sort of at, just how you're thinking from a competitive standpoint versus some of your peers?

I mean, I think you're right. I mean, our leases, as you'd expect with a higher credit profile, typically, those leases are going to be a little bit flatter than maybe some of the other peers that are really kind of financing through sales leasebacks, kind of your smaller credits.

But that being said, and I think we're also going to have and we view it as predictability of cash flow, should be a little bit better on a go forward basis. So maybe a little bit less than in rent loss.

But yes, I mean, we're getting close to 1% on our escalators within our leases. And so, I think inflation is maybe not going to be here permanently.

It could be a temporary situation where it comes into the portfolio, if you listen to Mr. Powell.

But yes, I mean I think that if you're anticipating a very high inflation market then our leases are going to be a little bit less attractive.

And then I guess I have one other one, just in terms of cap rates for this year and sort of recently as well as you're seeing any sort of movement, just within the sort of IG category that you guys are targeting?

We really have not, I mean, I think there's a good advantage to the fact that we're only looking to acquire 80 million or so per quarter. So that allows us to really store significantly more than that, and then focus really on the assets where we think the pricing is a little bit less efficient and really kind of chop off that tail of that bell curve, and has really allowed us to get pretty attractive cap rates.

As a private company, we've shown that as a public company in the last couple of quarters, and even in the first quarter we're seeing similar types of cap rates.

Andy, I just wanted to follow-up. I think you said acquisitions would be back end weighted.

Was that for the quarter or for the year? And I guess it seems like the pipeline's growing.

So I'm just curious why deal flow would sort of slow from the current pace of it, if that's the case?

I mean, I don't have the deal flow was going to slow in any material way, I would just tell you that the nature of the beast for us has been that on average, if you look at it since last year, if you look at the average timing of our execution of our acquisitions, I think that they're like the second day of the third month of the quarter. And as Mark indicated in his prepared remarks, I think that that's just been somewhat typical to what it is that we've seen.

And from a modeling perspective, the impact of that for a company of our size can be meaningful. But what we're pushing, as Mark indicated, we're pushing as we go into end of first quarter into second quarter to try to change that.

But from a modeling perspective, like I said, it could be a meaningful impact.

And then Mark, you talked a bit about the COVID resistant nature of the company's tenants, which benefited a bit during the pandemic, some convenience, auto, drugstores. How are you thinking about tenant categories and credits moving forward, as we hopefully continue to move away from the pandemic?

Is there a little bit of froth in the market around the edges, maybe that could benefit the company from a capital recycling standpoint? Would you potentially look to shift away from essential retail to some extent, either in terms of some of the newer acquisitions you're looking at or assets that you might be looking to sell?

And when you think about, when Andy and I first started, trying to raise capital for this venture back and I guess it was back half of 2019, the strategy was the same as it is today, very focused on the essential retailers. Ones that are really -- what's working in retail today was really what was working pre-COVID as well, and those sectors are really where we focus on those defensive names.

And so it was a little bit less popular when we were raising capital back in late 2019 and into early 2020 pre-COVID. But that being said, that's our strategy.

We think retail is going to continue to evolve. We think having capital available and management teams that have shown a propensity to continue to reinvest in their business, are going to be the ones that are going to be left standing.

And really that's what we think is the appropriate way to invest in retail. And so it shouldn't surprise you that that held up very well in the first bit of disruption.

I think we're going to see more disruption may come sooner or may come later, but we want to be prepared for that disruption as it comes over the next 10, 20 years. And so I would not anticipate us selling off our assets and going buying movie theaters or things that are really outside of our evaluate.

But on the margin, we will look to, if the market is going to pay us with a very aggressive cap rate for a specific asset, we're always going to be opportunistically looking to recycle capital. But I think we'd be redeploying back into what our bread and butter is, which is essential retail.

Just last one from me, apologies if I missed this. But can you just talk about that development project that was disclosed in the 10-K?

What kind of asset and tenant credit is that? And is that an area where you see some growth opportunities?

Yes, I mean I think we've got a few development projects in the works. It's something that we spoke a lot about really at the time of the roadshow in the IPO.

It is an area that we're really going to focus on, try to drive a little bit more yield that way. But really getting those going takes some time and now we're starting to see the fruits of the labor of the acquisitions team.

So I do think that is an area that you'll see us be a little bit more active.

What kind of yield expectations are you targeting for that project or for developments in general?

So we're not going to be spec developers and we're not going to go buy a land and build a building and hope someone comes. We're only going to get involved in the development process in the event that we've got a lease in hand with a tenant.

So we're going to be pretty far and that shouldn't be too surprising pretty conservative with the way that we approach development. And I think we'll pick up maybe 50 basis points.

I don't think it's going to be -- again, we're not going to take much risk. And we need the lease in hand, we need the tenant to get to the site and we need to keep developer into a pretty tight box in terms of cost overruns and the like.

And so we think it could be a meaningful percentage of what we do, because we're not really looking to deploy several $100 million a quarter. So if we can do $30 million, $40 million a year in that area, we think that can really help move the needle on our yields.

Well, thank you, everyone for joining and your interest in NETSTREIT. Again, if you are attending the REIT conference next week, hopefully, we'll got a chance to talk.

We're really excited about the growth opportunities ahead of us for NETSTREIT. So take care everyone.