Vulcan Materials Company logo

Vulcan Materials Company

VMC US

Vulcan Materials CompanyUnited States Composite

247.58

USD
-0.23
(-0.09%)

Q4 2012 · Earnings Call Transcript

Mar 7, 2013

Executives

William Matthew Brown - Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President William J. Sandbrook - Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Analysts

Matthew Dodson Austin Hopper Jason Bernzweig Craig Beresin John Messenger - Redburn Partners LLP, Research Division

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the U.S. Concrete Incorporated Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Earnings Conference Call [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call may be recorded.

I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Matt Brown, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. You may begin.

William Matthew Brown

Thank you, Ashley. Good morning, and welcome to U.S.

Concrete's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Earnings Conference Call. We appreciate your interest in U.S.

Concrete and we are pleased to share our results with you. Joining me on the call today is Bill Sandbrook, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Before I turn the call over to Bill, I would like to cover a few administrative items. Information recorded on this call speaks only as of today and therefore you are advised that time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate as of the date of any replay.

We will discuss certain topics that contain forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements are intended to qualify for the Safe Harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements include but are not limited to statements related to projected revenues, volumes and pricing and other financial and operating results, capital expenditures, strategies, expectations, intentions, plans, future events, performance, underlying assumptions and other statements that do not relate to historical or current facts. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can provide no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.

Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are discussed in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If you would like to be on an e-mail distribution list to receive future news releases, please contact Laura Russell at (817) 835-4111.

If you would like to listen to a replay of today's call, it's available in the Investor Relations section of our website. Please also note that you can find the reconciliation to non-GAAP financial measures that we will discuss on this call in the Form 8-K filed earlier today and in the Investor Relations section of our website.

This morning, we issued a detailed press release, which contains information regarding our fourth quarter and full year 2012 results. So during the call this morning, we will provide a brief overview and leave as much time as possible for Q&A.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Bill Sandbrook, our President and CEO, to discuss the highlights for the fourth quarter and full year 2012.

William J. Sandbrook

Thanks, Matt. I'm pleased to announce that the positive momentum we built in the first half of the year continued through the end of the fourth quarter.

Our year was marked with significant progress on many fronts. We successfully completed the acquisition of 3 ready-mixed operations that complement our existing markets, executed the sale of non-core assets allowing us to focus on our core ready-mix business, accomplished the move of our corporate headquarters from Houston to Euless, Texas, opportunistically refinanced our ABL facility and grew both volumes and pricing in all regions.

In the fourth quarter, we acquired Bode Concrete, located in San Francisco, as I discussed on our last call. Additionally, we completed the sale of substantially all of our assets associated with Smith Precast, which is located in Phoenix, Arizona, to Jensen Precast, for $4.3 million in cash and the assumption of certain obligations.

This marks the sale in 2012 of 6 out of the 7 precast plants owned by the company. We continue to evaluate our strategic alternatives for our remaining precast operation in Pennsylvania.

In our press release issued earlier today, we informed the market that in the fourth quarter of 2012, we made changes to our reportable segments to better align them with our overall strategy and the manner in which we organize and operate our business. As a result of this change, our new reportable segments will be: Ready-Mixed Concrete and Aggregate Products.

Our previously reported Precast Concrete Products segment was eliminated when 6 of the company's 7 precast plants were sold during 2012. Our remaining precast plant, as well as other products and services that were previously associated with the Ready-Mixed Concrete and Concrete-Related Products segment, are no longer associated with a reportable segment.

These other products and services include: Our building materials stores; hauling operations; lime slurry; Aridus rapid-drying concrete technology; brokered product sales; and our recycled aggregates operation. All historical segment results discussed on the call today will be restated to conform with these changes.

Now let me cover a few highlights of our fourth quarter and the full year results. Our fourth quarter ready-mixed volume and revenue were up 15.7% and 16.8%, respectively, compared to the fourth quarter of 2011.

This marks our ninth consecutive quarter for year-over-year revenue growth and the sixth consecutive quarter for year-over-year volume growth. Adjusted EBITDA of $5.7 million was up $1.1 million or 24.3% compared to the fourth quarter of 2011.

For the year, our ready-mix volume and revenue were up 19.6% and 22.1%, respectively, compared to 2011. Ready-mixed pricing also improved, with average selling prices rising 1.1% for the fourth quarter and 3.3% for the year compared to 2011.

We remain encouraged by the improvement in all of our construction markets and continue to focus on operational improvements and strategic enhancements to further our success. With that, I would like to turn the call back over to Matt to discuss our results in a little more detail.

William Matthew Brown

Thanks, Bill. This morning, we reported consolidated revenue of $134.9 million and a net loss of $12 million for the fourth quarter of 2012.

This compares to consolidated revenue of $117.8 million and net income of approximately $900,000 for the fourth quarter of 2011. Before I discuss the key aspects of our results, such as price and volume trends, I want to point out that the fourth quarter 2012 reported net loss includes a $13.2 million loss from fair value changes in our embedded derivative related to the convertible notes and warrants.

This is a noncash loss that is calculated, revalued and recorded each quarter based on several inputs, one of which is our stock price. The increase in our stock price from $6.48 per share on September 30, 2012, to $9.05 per share on December 31, 2012, is a primary driver of the loss we recorded on the derivative during the fourth quarter.

Also included in our fourth quarter 2012 net loss were approximately $200,000 in non-stock -- or noncash stock compensation expense and $200,000 of expense related to the corporate headquarters relocation. Included in the fourth quarter 2011 net income was a noncash gain related to the company's derivatives of approximately $3.6 million, approximately $700,000 of noncash stock compensation expense and approximately $400,000 of cost related to the departure of former President and CEO and the hiring of our new President and CEO.

Excluding these items, our net income improved to a positive $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to a loss of $1.6 million in the prior-year quarter. Now let's turn to the key operating measures for the fourth quarter.

Total revenues were up by 14.5% year-over-year for the quarter. Ready-mix revenue increased by $17.5 million or 16.8% year-over-year due to a combination of higher revenue -- or higher volumes and higher average sales prices per cubic yard.

Aggregate products revenue increased by $2.2 million or 34.2% for the same period. As Bill mentioned previously, this marks the ninth consecutive quarter where we've reported an increase in consolidated revenue on a year-over-year comparative basis.

Ready-mix volume for the quarter increased by 15.7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2011. We are pleased to see that the ready-mixed volumes have now increased year-over-year for the last 6 consecutive quarters.

On the price side, we realized an increase in our average ready-mix sales price of 1.1%, from $97.70 per yard in the fourth quarter 2011 to $98.81 per yard in the fourth quarter of 2012. This remains particularly encouraging since the larger portion of our increase in volume for the quarter was in our lower-priced markets, principally in Texas.

On a market-by-market comparison, the average selling price per cubic yard increased in all of our major markets and this is the seventh consecutive quarter we've consolidated year-over-year increases. To that point, our Ready-Mixed Concrete raw material spread was 47.5% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to 44.1% in the fourth quarter of 2011.

We saw increases in material spread in all of our major markets for the quarter as we were able to effectively pass through increased costs of cement and aggregates in the form of increased pricing and additional sales of value-added products. The actual raw material spread in dollars per yard increased by $3.90 for the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the fourth quarter of 2011.

Fuel cost increased once again during the fourth quarter of 2012 and we paid an average of 2% more in fuel cost per yard of concrete delivered when compared to the fourth quarter of 2011. Operational efficiencies from increased volume, however, combined with our fuel surcharge mechanisms were able to more than offset higher fuel costs as Ready-Mixed Concrete operating margins for the fourth quarter of 2012 increased 4.9 percentage points over the fourth quarter of 2011.

Our SG&A expenses increased by $4.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the fourth quarter of 2011, primarily due to expenses related to the recently completed relocation of the corporate headquarters, increased incentive compensation accruals and increased legal and professional fees related to the sale of our Arizona precast operations, the acquisition of Bode Concrete in San Francisco and our ongoing strategic review of our capital structure, which I will touch on more later in the call. We continue to focus on and aggressively manage our SG&A cost.

The incremental costs incurred during the fourth quarter of 2012 were substantially either nonrecurring in nature or incurred to enable accretive acquisitions or to provide ongoing improvements in operating margins. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA increased by 24.3% to $5.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to $4.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue was 4.3% for the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to 3.9% for the prior-year quarter. For the fourth quarter of 2012, ready-mixed yards per truck increased by 8.1% from the fourth quarter of 2011, and yards per man-hour increased by 7.6% for the same period year-over-year.

As to operating cash flow, during the fourth quarter of 2012, we generated cash from operations of $18.7 million compared to $8.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2011. This increase was primarily the result of working capital improvements.

The company generated free cash flow, defined as cash from operations less capital expenditures plus proceeds from asset disposals, of $22.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, an increase of $12.9 million from the $9.5 million generated in the fourth quarter of 2011. Included in our fourth quarter 2012 free cash flow were $4.3 million in cash proceeds received from the sale of our Arizona precast operations.

For the fourth quarter of 2012, we spent $3.9 million on capital expenditures, up approximately $3.5 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2011. As volumes continue to increase with demand, we will continue to adjust spending to reflect our current outlook for future production requirements.

The book value of our long-term debt, including current maturities, was $63.5 million on December 31, 2012. This included $46.1 million of convertible notes due 2015 and $13.3 million of borrowings under the senior secured credit facility, plus $4 million of other notes payable.

The difference between the book value of the convertible notes and the face amount of $55 million is due to the discount recorded on the convertible notes as a result of the separate valuation of the embedded derivative at issuance. As of December 31, 2012, we had $13.3 million drawn on our credit facility with $12.2 million of undrawn letters of credit outstanding.

This compares to December 31, 2011, when we had $15.1 million drawn on our credit facility, with $18.7 million of undrawn letters of credit outstanding. This left us with $52.4 million of availability as of December 31, 2012, compared to $31.2 million available as of December 31, 2011.

Our availability is net of a $2.0 million reserve for sales and use tax, which reduces availability in accordance with the credit agreement. We also had $4.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet at the end of 2012.

In accordance with our credit agreement, upon the incurrence of certain events, we must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1:1 for the trailing 12-month period. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2012, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.97:1.

In accordance with the indenture governing our convertible notes, we must also maintain a consolidated secured debt ratio of no more than 7.5:1. As of December 31, 2012, our consolidated secured debt ratio was 3.22:1.

As I briefly discussed earlier, we have been focused on the health of our balance sheet and the overall capital structure that will allow us to best achieve our short-term and long-term strategic goals. You may have seen that we recently filed a registration statement and corresponding tender offer documents with the SEC, with the intent to exchange our $55 million of convertible notes for $69.3 million of new senior secured notes.

The senior secured notes [indiscernible] 2015 will not be convertible to the company's common stock, will have a call feature that allows us to purchase the note [indiscernible] and will allow us to increase the availability on our revolving credit facility from $80 million to $102.5 million. The exchange, if consummated, will provide us with more liquidity and flexibility to execute our operational and strategic plan going forward.

The expiration date of the exchange offer is March 21, and if consummated, we expect to close on March 22. Now, let me turn the call back over to Bill.

William J. Sandbrook

Thanks, Matt. We are encouraged by the initial signs of market recovery that we saw during 2012.

The continued rebound in residential construction markets is benefiting all of our regions. The architectural billings index, a leading economic indicator of nonresidential spending, indicated the strongest growth in billings since the end of 2007.

We continue to believe we are in there right geographic markets to capitalize on these trends as the pace of growth in our markets appears stronger than the national average. Both pricing and volume growth trends have continued and we have seized the opportunity to provided to us by favorable weather patterns in our markets in 2012.

Our ready-mix backlog at the end of the year was 5.7% higher than at the end of last year. We continue to aggressively pursue our strategic goals and assess and manage internal activity within our control such as pricing, cost containment and overhead reductions, and fully expect the investments we have made in these areas to benefit our performance in the coming year.

To wrap things up, our team's hard work and disciplined execution delivered improved results for 2012. We remain committed to strengthening our current market positions and capitalizing on the positive economic trends we are experiencing in our markets.

We believe our focused attention on the delivery of Ready-Mixed Concrete across the organization will drive superior financial performance and improve long-term shareholder value. Thank you for your interest in U.S.

Concrete. We look forward to reporting on our future successes.

We would now like to turn the call back over to the operator for the question-and-answer session.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Matthew Dodson of JWest LLC.

Matthew Dodson

Can you talk about your incremental margins you're seeing right now? You've done a great job of pushing price.

How much of that price flows through the bottom line and, when you get your capacity utilization, how much of that extra volume kind of flows through the bottom line?

William J. Sandbrook

Matthew, it depends on region and the underlying cost structure of the region and what the raw material costs are, obviously. But I would say, on average, it's between 20% and 30%.

Matthew Dodson

20% and 30%. And then, can you kind of give us an idea of the run rate for SG&A?

You had, you said, a lot of one-time costs in nature as we move into the first quarter. What is a good run rate [indiscernible] model?

William J. Sandbrook

We'd be targeting between 8% and 9% on sales. Now we've [indiscernible] we're accomplishing throughout the year some of our refinancing operations, as well as different health care and comp costs due to our relocation.

But I would start targeting -- our target, our internal target, would be 8%, although we might be a year or 2 off from that. And remember on that, a lot of that is dependent on the top line growth as opposed to further reductions in the underlying SG&A other than the one-offs.

Matthew Dodson

My last question for you, guys, is you've done a fantastic job of pushing price. Can you kind of give us an idea of what you've been able to do in first quarter so far on your price increases?

William J. Sandbrook

Sure. As you know, we operate in 5 specific regions and I count Washington, D.C.

as 1 of those 5. It's specific to each region, and it's usually tied to when we're seeing increases on our major raw material inputs, namely cement and aggregates.

So depending -- if we were seeing those increases at the beginning of the year, we would have immediately followed up with price increase announcements. However, a lot of those additional costs haven't been incurred yet and are due to hit our operations in April.

So I would say 75% of our price increase announcements are going to be effective April 1. And frankly, the markets are prepared for price increases this year because the cement companies have been signaling all through the fourth quarter and into the first quarter of this year their intentions to increase pricing.

Matthew Dodson

Just to clarify, that means you are staying ahead of their price increases, correct?

William J. Sandbrook

Correct.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] We have a question from Austin Hopper of AWH Capital.

Austin Hopper

I just hope you could maybe comment more specifically on the Dallas, DFW market and just kind of tell us a bit more about that lately.

William J. Sandbrook

Sure, Austin. For those of you that lived in the DFW area or follow it, it's a very robust construction market that's starting to hit on all cylinders with many, many transportation and infrastructure projects on I-35, on I-635, and it seems like there's major projects under way throughout the entire metroplex.

That's carrying over into the commercial sector and the multifamily sector, with a lot of building downtown Dallas, downtown Fort Worth and in the suburbs. And the suburbs are getting much healthier as you see a lot of new projects coming online in the residential sector.

The Dallas/Fort Worth market has suffered for a number of years but it's getting healthy very quickly.

Operator

We have another follow-up question from Matthew -- we have a question from Jason Bernzweig of Zelman Capital.

Jason Bernzweig

Can you talk about your business in the context of the housing recovery? If I look at one of your most recent investor presentations, it looks like your residential exposure is kind of sub-20%, but if we go back to the 2006 area, it's to 2x to 3x that.

Is that the kind of growth trajectory we can expect if we kind of get back to 1.5 million housing starts for your business?

William J. Sandbrook

The -- we aren't specifically focused on residential. And historically, if you look at the company's performance during the peak residential build, between '03, '04, '05, '06, the margins were somewhat depressed because of an overweighting of the residential construction segment in our book of business.

So subsequent to that and coming out of the downturn, we've more focused on the commercial/industrial and, recently, some street and highway because of the large amount of projects available in our market areas. Now having said that, as residential comes back, we will use excess capacity in our plants into that segment.

But traditionally, it's been a much lower-priced market for us, with limited barriers to entry. And we've chosen to compete outside of that market for higher returns although, as res comes back, you can expect more volume growth for us, which then covers our -- carries over our fixed costs a little more.

But I wouldn't say that it's an overwhelming priority for us, although we will benefit from it.

Jason Bernzweig

Okay, I appreciate that. Second question kind of relates to the fragmentation of the industry.

Is M&A kind of a strategic priority for you for growth? And if so, when you kind of look at the landscape out there, is there attractive valuations to acquire new assets relative to kind of where you trade in the public market?

William J. Sandbrook

I would say that acquisitions are part of our strategic plan. However, we are focused on our underlying businesses for organic improvement and feel that we still have room to go there.

Although we're looking in all our markets for attractive tuck-in, bolt-on acquisitions, and there are opportunities in all of our markets that we are looking at and it will be part of our strategy going forward.

Operator

Our next question is from Craig Beresin of Watermill Institutional.

Craig Beresin

My question is, could you remind us on where we are in the exchange offer and what is necessary for it to be successful?

William Matthew Brown

Sure, Craig, it's Matt Brown. With respect to the exchange offer, we -- there's a threshold in the support agreement that we've agreed to with 2 of the large holders that we need 82.5% of the existing holders to tender their notes.

So that's the threshold we're dealing with and we have a -- per that support agreement, we have 2 of the major holders, basically, who've agreed to tender their notes. That represents $34.7 million principal amount out of the $55 million total.

So doing the math, the remainder is $10.7 million principal amount that we need and, typically, you won't see that come in until the last couple of days of the offer. So that's where we stand at this point.

The expiration date is now March 31 and we expect to close on the 22nd.

Operator

We have a follow-up question from Matthew Dodson of JWest LLC.

Matthew Dodson

A quick follow-up question for you guys. Can you talk about your EBITDA margins and where they are in the cycle?

And if you're successful in the cycle, where those EBITDA margins can go?

William J. Sandbrook

Yes, I'll take that, Matthew. We're still early in the cycle and the EBITDA margins, I believe, were about 4% for the quarter.

And that's still less than we would like them to be. We're targeting in the short to intermediate term, to be fairly healthy, I would say 10%.

But with the markets we're operating in, I'm expecting it to go north -- opportunity will be to go north of 10% when the recovery is in full steam.

Matthew Dodson

So, can you kind of help us, then? You said the short term 10%.

Should we kind of forecast 10% EBITDA margins next quarter as a run rate?

William J. Sandbrook

I mean, I really can't comment on that. Remember these -- were still at the beginning of this cycle.

You're seeing our run rate on price increases, you are seeing from the cement companies what they're looking for on their price increases to us. So it's not going to be that quick.

Matthew Dodson

Let me ask you a different way. What revenue target would you need to get to, to get that EBITDA to 10%?

William J. Sandbrook

That's really a hard question to answer. The way I would respond to that, if you look at the historical U.S.

Concrete results, you would need to be -- and I'm just speaking historical and things have changed since then, up around the $700 million range historically for this company. Is this cycle going to be similar to the last one?

Perhaps, perhaps not. But from a historical perspective, that's where it was.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] We have a question from John Messenger of Redburn Partners.

John Messenger - Redburn Partners LLP, Research Division

Just a couple of quick questions, if I could. The first one was just, Bill, you mentioned there, in terms of spending in the year ahead and a lot will clearly depend on how the market evolves but, relative to CapEx it obviously has moved up a couple of million year over year.

Are you looking at spending kind of around the $10 million mark or is it something that will move north of that? And when we think about how, obviously, EBITDA margin moving through to EBIT margin, there's clearly been a benefit as your depreciation has been dropping off by about $3 million year-over-year.

When we look at the fourth quarter, the depreciation just moved up somewhat. Is that driven by the acquisitions at the back end of the year or just when we think about your modeling, where you're going to be in terms of that EBITDA?

Obviously, it's better to see EBIT rather than EBITDA. But if you could just give us any help on those 2, that'd be great.

William J. Sandbrook

Sure. there has been a reluctance to spend capital as the financial condition of the company deteriorated in '09, '10, '11.

So we do have some catch up to go there. We're targeting, as a long-term run rate, about 4% of revenue.

So that would help your modeling on that. And on the depreciation in the fourth quarter, it did tick up because of the acquisitions that we had undertaken.

Matthew Dodson

Great. And then just one follow on.

You mentioned earlier that, obviously, the backlog is there, price increases from 1st of April. But just thinking around first quarter, given that the cement guys are all claiming that they put through price increases from 1st of January, do you have any issue at all in terms of capturing margin improvement in Q1?

Or were you already pricing for that increase coming through from 1st of January?

William J. Sandbrook

Remember, towards the end of last year, and I've mentioned this on previous conference calls, part of our strategy on pricing is not to rely necessarily on a single price announcement or 2 price announcements spaced throughout the year. That really only covers a portion of your total revenue stream or total customer base.

Project by project, remember we're a project-driven industry, we have been increasing prices all through last year, including outside of our announced price increases. So you're going to continue to see that we're staying ahead of our raw material input increases.

But we will officially -- we have officially announced in some of our markets the January 1 price increase and the other is April 1. But that's not our only means to increase prices.

Operator

Thank you. I'm not showing another question so I'd like to turn the call back over to management for any further remarks.

William J. Sandbrook

Thank you, Ashley. Thank you, everyone, for participating in the call this morning and for your support of U.S.

Concrete. We look forward to discussing our first quarter 2013 results with you in May.

Thanks again for your support.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program.

You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.

)